2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10669-020-09769-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant species identification using color learning resources, shape, texture, through machine learning and artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a method that has been successful in classifying biological data, performed to classify leaves and pollens. In this experiment, the deep learning network obtained a result very close to SVM, in which both performed better (Bambil et al 2020). Comparing different classification techniques makes it possible to reduce the issues surrounding algorithm choice in the classification of features (Wen et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used a method that has been successful in classifying biological data, performed to classify leaves and pollens. In this experiment, the deep learning network obtained a result very close to SVM, in which both performed better (Bambil et al 2020). Comparing different classification techniques makes it possible to reduce the issues surrounding algorithm choice in the classification of features (Wen et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The algorithm classification allows one to verify which has the best performance of classification and, thus, to analyse and evaluate the best method for solving problems (Bambil et al 2020). The use of different algorithms is necessary for information extraction and seed classification, as these algorithms address morphological aspects such as shape (Granitto et al 2005), colour and texture (Granitto et al 2002), as well as size (Granitto et al 2003), aspects that are adequate for the classification of different types of seeds (Wäldchen et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As imagens obtidas do dataset ISIC foram processadas em 2 (dois) momentos: inicialmente para a classificação com o algoritmo HGBC elas foram submetidas ao extrator de características desenvolvido por um dos autores desse trabalho e disponível na plataforma FAON_MLP. O atual extrator extrai 785 atributos que envolvem características estatísticas de primeira ordem (histograma e forma), textura, padrão binário local, momentos de HU, momentos de Zernike, características de Haralik e informações do valor mínimo, máximo, média e desvio padrão para cada canal de cor vermelho/verde/azul (RGB, do inglês red/green/blue), tonalidade/saturação/brilho (HSV, do inglês hue/saturation/value) e CIELab [12]. Após analisar e verificar que alguns dos atributos produzidos são constantes, os mesmos são descartados, restando um arquivo de valores separados por vírgula (CSV, do inglês commaseparated values) de entrada com 631 atributos.…”
Section: B Extração De Característicasunclassified
“…They compared the performance of deep learning algorithms to other machine learning techniques, and discussed the strengths and weaknesses of each. Bambil et al (2020) compared deep learning to other machine learning techniques, with an application of identification of plant species from images of leaves. The authors further compared image capture methods including scanners and mobile phone cameras, finding that the algorithms performed similarly in each case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%