Plant–Virus Interactions

Yadav, Sunita; Chhibbar, Anju K.

doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7371-7_3

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies showed that plant cytoplasm is the location where the virus replicates within the host (Yadav & Chhibbar, 2018 ). We found that the IP‐L‐NbAS‐B complex localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figures 2 and 3 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nicotiana benthamiana asparagine synthetase associates with IP‐L and confers resistance against tobacco mosaic virus via the asparagine‐induced salicylic acid signalling pathway

Liu

Tian

et al. 2021

Molecular Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nicotiana benthamiana asparagine synthetase associates with IP‐L and confers resistance against tobacco mosaic virus via the asparagine‐induced salicylic acid signalling pathway

Liu

Tian

et al. 2021

Molecular Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Models of general resistance of most pathogens don't fit well with viral resistance because of the intracellular parasitic nature of the virus. For example, receptors of pattern recognition, serving as a major defense component by triggering the first layer of resistance when a receptor of plasma membrane perceives a fungal or bacterial MAMP or PAMP, can play no role in fighting plant viruses because viruses do not express extracellular PAMPs (Yadav and Chhibbar, 2018;Zhang et al, 2022). There is always a never-ending battle between pathogens and their hosts, to which the pathogen responds by creating modifications in effectors and developing new effectors to defeat the ETI mechanism, as the plant also produces new R proteins, facilitating recognition of these new effectors.…”

Section: Strategies For Creating Broad-spectrum Viral Resistance Thro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 AND RETRONs TECHNIQUES: A PERSPECTIVE APPLICATION ON TOMATO

HIEU¹,

TOAN²

2023

SABRAOJBG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant breeding has recently become a vital process in developing desired crop plants. Advances in genetic engineering occur more quickly than ever, with several crops generally created through traditional and modern techniques resulting in increased biomass and phytochemical compounds and adapted to the detrimental environment, such as biotic and abiotic stresses. More precisely, thousands of plant species gained enhancements suitable to various climatic and topographic conditions through genome editing; hence, people’s dreams soon became a reality by implementing biotechnology to study many well-established fundamental grounds. Beliefs that biotechnology will progressively develop are happening in various aspects of modern sciences for crop development to be implemented based on genetic material. Besides the aforementioned benefits, this review manuscript will describe the progress of genome editing like CRISPR/Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated protein 9) with its modification and Retrons in crops and then determine its beneficial effects, which are more valuable through the application of these methods in crop development. The review further aims to assess the perspective application of CRISPR-Cas9 in the development strategies of virus-resistant tomatoes.

show abstract

“…The basic noticeable feature of gene-for-gene mediated resistance is the development of an HR by the plant against phytopathogens [ 78 ] wherein necrotic lesions or ringspots are developed at the location of infection on leaves, stems, and fruits, confining the phytopathogen within it and thus protecting noninfected tissues (Fig. 3 ) [ 79 ]. Furthermore, during an HR, modifications occur in the plant cell wall structure, such as an increase in the calcium ion concentration; an oxidative burst (superoxide and nitric oxide); and upsurges in endogenous salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and hydrogen peroxide levels [ 80 , 81 ].…”

Section: Responses In Host Plants Against Plant Virus Effector Proteimentioning

confidence: 99%

Host Plant Strategies to Combat Against Viruses Effector Proteins

Marwal

Gaur

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

: Viruses are obligate parasites that exist in an inactive state until they enter the host body. Upon entry, viruses become active and start replicating by using the host cell machinery. All plant viruses can augment their transmission, thus powering their detrimental effects on the host plant. To diminish infection and diseases caused by viruses, the plant has a defence mechanism known as pathogenesis-related biochemicals, which are metabolites and proteins. Proteins that ultimately prevent pathogenic diseases are called R proteins. Several plant R genes (that confirm resistance) and avirulence protein (Avr) (pathogen Avr gene-encoded proteins [effector/elicitor proteins involved in pathogenicity]) molecules have been identified. The recognition of such a factor results in the plant defence mechanism. During plant viral infection, the replication and expression of a viral molecule lead to a series of a hypersensitive response (HR) and affect the host plant’s immunity (pathogen-associated molecular pattern–triggered immunity and effector-triggered immunity). Avr protein renders the host RNA silencing mechanism and its innate immunity, chiefly known as silencing suppressors towards the plant defensive machinery. This is a strong reply to the plant defensive machinery by harmful plant viruses. In this review, we describe the plant pathogen resistance protein and how these proteins regulate host immunity during plant–virus interactions. Furthermore, we have discussed regarding ribosome-inactivating proteins, ubiquitin proteasome system, translation repression (nuclear shuttle protein interacting kinase 1), DNA methylation, dominant resistance genes, and autophagy-mediated protein degradation, which are crucial in antiviral defences.

show abstract

Plant–Virus Interactions

Cited by 7 publications

References 91 publications

Nicotiana benthamiana asparagine synthetase associates with IP‐L and confers resistance against tobacco mosaic virus via the asparagine‐induced salicylic acid signalling pathway

Nicotiana benthamiana asparagine synthetase associates with IP‐L and confers resistance against tobacco mosaic virus via the asparagine‐induced salicylic acid signalling pathway

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 AND RETRONs TECHNIQUES: A PERSPECTIVE APPLICATION ON TOMATO

Host Plant Strategies to Combat Against Viruses Effector Proteins

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About