2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42106-020-00125-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planting Density Affected Dry Matter Production, Partitioning, and Yield in Machine Harvestable Chickpea Genotypes in the Irrigated Ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such variations among the genotypes might be due to the genetic constitution of different genotypes, which provides the inherent capacity to perform in different ways. This result is in support of Patil et al [22] in chickpea.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Such variations among the genotypes might be due to the genetic constitution of different genotypes, which provides the inherent capacity to perform in different ways. This result is in support of Patil et al [22] in chickpea.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This might be attributed to optimum number of plants per unit area at the seed rate of 105 kg ha -1 which helped in better utilization of resources, hence more photosynthesis and assimilate translocation from source (leaf) to sink (seed). Patil et al (2021) also reported significantly higher seed and haulm yield with higher seed rate in machine planted chickpea.…”
Section: Yieldmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Studies have shown that agronomic interventions like ZT sowing and residue retention can also alter yield potential with appropriate varieties (Singh et al 2017). A cultivar's branching pattern (high or low) and branching angle may also have a direct effect on its yield potential under rice fallows (Patil et al 2020). Chickpea genotypes have wider variability for traits like height, branching and plant vigour and thus there would have a differential yield variability and potential productivity (Singh et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%