1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02294916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planting flexibility: Implications for agricultural sustainability

Abstract: There is a general belief that federal commodity programs restrict adoption of more sustainable production systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift to systems more intensive than WF has been doable primarily because of developments in herbicides, improvements in field equipment, and increased flexibility in crop selection in government programs. Planting flexibility is necessary for the implementation of more crop‐intensive, sustainable production systems (Setia et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shift to systems more intensive than WF has been doable primarily because of developments in herbicides, improvements in field equipment, and increased flexibility in crop selection in government programs. Planting flexibility is necessary for the implementation of more crop‐intensive, sustainable production systems (Setia et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%