Over the years I have made my old examinations available to students, but I do not supply the answer keys. I offer to discuss answers with them individually and at review sessions. I explain why I do not provide answers by telling them there is a difference between "knowing" the answer and "understanding" the answer. Still some students want the answers. I know that some educators agree and argue that students need to have the answers to provide positive feedback and help them learn. That may be true in certain contexts, but my experience is different.A couple of years ago in this journal, I published one of my favorite problem-based learning (PBL) 1 problems, Plants versus Animals in the Dining Hall [1]. It used the story of a first year college student as the context for learning amino acid metabolism. The student had become vegetarian during her first semester and returned home at Thanksgiving to confront a golden brown turkey and her exasperated mother. For each of the five stages, I provided a set of teaching notes that described my rationale for how I developed the problem, the difficulty students had with the problem, and my expectations for student learning. I also included a particularly well done concept map produced by students and a discussion of acceptable answers. Subsequently, I have suffered for my indiscretion.The next time I used that problem in an intermediary metabolism course, the students got much less out of it than students in previous classes because the problem was now on-line. It did not take long for someone in the class to find it and leak the news to the rest of the class that the "answers" were available. This immediately shortcircuited the PBL process, and students were deprived of working through the various stages, thinking about the issues, searching for relevant information, and formulating responses based on their understanding. With my commentary available to the world, the students no longer had to exercise their higher order thinking skills. Their interest in getting a good grade (having the right answer) trumped the PBL process (achieving a deeper understanding).A colleague of mine had a similar experience when her students discovered the answers to their PBL problem on a course website at another school that had used the same problem. Although the Internet enabled the unwanted dissemination of answers in both cases, the demand for answers transcends the Internet.For example, recently I engaged briefly in an aborted effort to generate one PBL problem for each chapter in a well known biochemistry textbook. The task, by its nature, compromised the PBL process, which values problems as a way to introduce content rather than to review content at the end of a chapter. Furthermore, PBL problems should be complex and integrate content from multiple chapters, other courses, and diverse sources rather than tie in too closely with a particular book chapter. However, the most compromising expectation was that the solutions manual needed an answer key. Based on my experience of how a...