Recent years have seen a sharp increase in the scholarly interest in planning and social engineering, which became widespread in the Western world as well as the colonies and postcolonial states in the age of High Modernity. This age, covering the years between 1890 and 1970, has been distinguished from other periods, firstly, by the sheer rapidity of economic, social and cultural changes, such as industrialisation, urbanisation, mass emigration, and the «scientification» of society. 1 What qualifies this period as distinctively modern, however, is that contemporaries themselves were aware that they were entering a «new» era, which offered increased opportunities to shape their own future. 2 The modern became a category of self-identification, combining a sense of crisis with a strong belief in the possibility to perfect society through interventions. Expectations were high: Modernity itself would provide the means, such as scientific knowledge and technological innovations, to channel the sweeping changes and restore a stable order in the post-liberal age. «Planning» as a concept «embodies the belief that social change can be engineered and directed, produced at will». 3 Its emergence at the end of the nineteenth century should be attributed to the rise of the modern political economy, which fostered an instrumental attitude towards nature and people. In reaction to the disturbing social consequences produced by laissez-faire capitalism, industrialisation and urbanisation, professionals and experts launched initiatives to improve social conditions, resulting in the rise of town planning and the incipient welfare state. The state-and at times socially minded industrialists too-became the guarantor of social progress.