2008
DOI: 10.13109/gege.2008.34.3.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planung. Geschichte und Gegenwart des Vorgriffs auf die Zukunft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…They convincingly argue that planning and social engineering are trans-ideological historical phenomena, which have occurred in liberal-democratic and authoritarian contexts alike in the age of High Modernity. 9 This special issue adheres to this reading of planning history: a belief in (state) planning and in the creation of harmonious and coherent social orders emerged on the left as well as the right, under democratic and non-democratic regimes alike. To that, however, this issue adds the plea for a decentred inquiry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…They convincingly argue that planning and social engineering are trans-ideological historical phenomena, which have occurred in liberal-democratic and authoritarian contexts alike in the age of High Modernity. 9 This special issue adheres to this reading of planning history: a belief in (state) planning and in the creation of harmonious and coherent social orders emerged on the left as well as the right, under democratic and non-democratic regimes alike. To that, however, this issue adds the plea for a decentred inquiry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Special journals on the Soviet Union were founded, established journals dedicated special issues to the Soviet Union, and countless individual articles depicted the features of a society that was seen as unique. 27 Actually, distrust in liberal capitalism—as the source of the world economic crisis—and an interest in planning was a global phenomenon at that time, irrespective of ideological inclinations (Zheng and Tang, 2008: 54; van Laak, 2008; Schivelbusch, 2005). Chinese intellectuals had even more reason to study the Soviet Union since its development demonstrated that rapid industrialization could enable an economically backward country to catch up with advanced societies.…”
Section: The “Soviet Fever” Of the Early 1930s And “Soviet Socialism”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that get configured in particular ways in particular places at particular times. Some authors have addressed the ways in which infrastructure have been used to build a sustain political regimes, whether as instruments of territorial integration for nation states (van Laak 2001). We have many examples of close ties of water infrastructure (water canals) and geopolitical processes and developments.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%