2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Concentrations and Cancer-Associated Mutations in Cell-Free Circulating DNA of Treatment-Naive Follicular Lymphoma for Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis and Prognosis

Abstract: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most frequent non-Hodgkin lymphoma accounting for 10-20% of all lymphomas in western countries. As a clinically heterogeneous cancer, FL occasionally undergoes histological transformation to more aggressive B cell lymphoma types that are associated with poor prognosis. Here we evaluated the potential of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of follicular lymphoma patients. Twenty well-characterized FL cases (13 symptomatic and 7 asymptom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the consistency between WTS and qRT-PCR expression values through calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficients, RStudio software version 4.0.2 (RStudio Team, Boston, MA, USA, https://www.rstudio.com/, accessed on 23 July 2022) was used, as described previously [48]. The WTS data values used in linear correlation analyses were initially obtained by dividing normalized counts per million (CPM) values of CCND1 or SNHG5 to the CPM values of the RPS13 housekeeping gene for each sample after differential expression (DE) analysis of MCL tumor samples (n = 32) and reactive tonsil B-cell subset samples (n = 5).…”
Section: Comparison Of Wts and Qrt-pcr Results With Linear Correlatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the consistency between WTS and qRT-PCR expression values through calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficients, RStudio software version 4.0.2 (RStudio Team, Boston, MA, USA, https://www.rstudio.com/, accessed on 23 July 2022) was used, as described previously [48]. The WTS data values used in linear correlation analyses were initially obtained by dividing normalized counts per million (CPM) values of CCND1 or SNHG5 to the CPM values of the RPS13 housekeeping gene for each sample after differential expression (DE) analysis of MCL tumor samples (n = 32) and reactive tonsil B-cell subset samples (n = 5).…”
Section: Comparison Of Wts and Qrt-pcr Results With Linear Correlatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For differential transcript expression analyses with DESeq2, FDR-adjusted p values were obtained through correction of the Wald test p values with multiple testing by applying the Benjamini and Hochberg method [ 40 ]. The significance of the MCL survival differences between two patient groups dichotomized based on the expression of transcripts or immunocyte ratios was evaluated by calculating p values based on the log-rank test [ 48 ]. To evaluate the consistency between expression values obtained with whole transcriptome sequencing and qRT-PCR for selected transcripts, the p values were calculated via Pearson correlation testing for paired expressions [ 49 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…qPCR-based techniques are also commonly used to quantify cfDNA.With their high sensitivity ( Pan et al, 2017 ), accuracy ( Leung et al, 2021 ), and low false positive rate ( Yin et al, 2022 ), these methods can be used to measure trace nucleic acids effectively ( Pan et al, 2017 ) and analyze cfDNA for known mutations ( Hatipoglu et al, 2022 ). By detecting housekeeping genes ( Aucamp et al, 2016 ) or noncoding repetitive sequences ( Hussein et al, 2019 ) in cfDNA and fitting the standard curve with a reference substance ( Tang et al, 2020 ), absolute cfDNA concentrations can be quantified using PCR-based methods.…”
Section: Preanalytical Variables Affecting Cfdna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the field of cfDNA is still developing, and cfDNA assays often show insufficient sensitivity and specificity for many cancers, especially for those in the early stages (8,11). Linear DNA is unstable (T1/2 = 114 min, (12)) and is only found at low concentrations in plasma, causing high variability of cfDNA concentration and content among patients and samples (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). This reduces linear plasma DNA's applicability as a broad cancer marker despite its relevance as a direct indicator of tumor constituents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%