1984
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4347(84)80108-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma cyclophosphamide assay by selective ion monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liquid extraction procedures were adapted from previous work reported by Lartigue-Mattei, 8 Mehta" and Jardine,6 the solid-phase extraction procedures were based on previous work from El-Yazigi," Burton" and Hardy.13 The solid-phase extraction cartridges can only be applied at acidic and neutral pH values. The results of these experiments are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Recovery Of Cpa Metabolites From Spiked Plasma Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid extraction procedures were adapted from previous work reported by Lartigue-Mattei, 8 Mehta" and Jardine,6 the solid-phase extraction procedures were based on previous work from El-Yazigi," Burton" and Hardy.13 The solid-phase extraction cartridges can only be applied at acidic and neutral pH values. The results of these experiments are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Recovery Of Cpa Metabolites From Spiked Plasma Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spectrometry [13], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [14,15], gas-liquid chromatography, both with and without derivatization , high performance liquid chromatography [21], and high performance liquid chromatography-field desorption mass spectrometry [22]. Since radiolabeling is clinically inconvenient and techniques using mass spectrometry hamper routine application in extensive pharmacological studies, gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus specific detection and high performance liquid chromatography seem attractive methods .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Further, methods have been formulated for the evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure among hospital personnel, as presented in Table 1. 4,11-21…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%