1983
DOI: 10.1088/0032-1028/25/9/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma electron density measurements by the laser- and collision-induced fluorescence method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two techniques for measuring plasma parameters non-intrusively are Microwave Interferometry (MWI) 7 and Laser-Induced-Fluorescence (LIF) 8 coupled with Laser-Collision Induced Fluorescence (LCIF) 9,10 . As these measurements are remote from the region whose characteristics are desired, they would seem an ideal solution to the problems of in-situ probe perturbation of an existing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two techniques for measuring plasma parameters non-intrusively are Microwave Interferometry (MWI) 7 and Laser-Induced-Fluorescence (LIF) 8 coupled with Laser-Collision Induced Fluorescence (LCIF) 9,10 . As these measurements are remote from the region whose characteristics are desired, they would seem an ideal solution to the problems of in-situ probe perturbation of an existing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method we propose is largely insensitive to pressure variations as described and thus is not subject to these drawbacks. The fact that these results can be used existing probe/object/wall measurements to determine the sheath can be extremely useful in the analysis of collected probe data.The two techniques for measuring plasma parameters non-intrusively are Microwave Interferometry (MWI) 7 and Laser-Induced-Fluorescence (LIF) 8 coupled with Laser-Collision Induced Fluorescence (LCIF) 9,10 . As these measurements are remote from the region whose characteristics are desired, they would seem an ideal solution to the problems of in-situ probe perturbation of an existing environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chall et al [1] measured n e ≈ 5 × 10 12 cm -3 from the time decay rate of the fluorescence signal at the laser wavelength at λ = 587.6 nm in an argon arc plasma of T e ≈ 0.4 eV with small admixture of helium. The electron density in the range n e = 10 11 -10 12 cm -3 in a helium plasma of T e ≈ 5 eV was determined by Tsuchida et al [2] from the ratio of time integrated collision-induced (λ = 667.8 nm) and laserinduced fluorescence signals upon the laser excitation at λ = 501.6 nm in singlet helium. Shcheglov et al [3] determined electron densities of n e ≈ 5 × 10 11 cm -3 in an argon plasma (T e ≈ 10 eV) with helium content using relative collision-induced signals I 388.9 nm /I 706.5 nm upon laser excitation at λ = 587.6 nm.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Electron Density From Laser-and Collision-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, at higher temperatures the signals will become poorer and the fits less reliable. In this case additional analysis by using the ratio of the time integrated laser-and collision-induced fluorescence signals can be applied [2]. (From the experimental point of view this additional measurement would require a spatial separation of fluorescence photons at both wavelengths e.g.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Electron Density From Laser-and Collision-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation