1975
DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(75)80021-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma emission sources in analytical spectroscopy—II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An error of at least 20% in excitation temperatures, calculated from Boltzmann plot and the line-pair method, must be allowed. 11 The excitation temperatures obtained in this work agree within 10% of each other. The excitation temperature serves as a guide to the ability for the atom source to excite electronic transitions.…”
Section: B Excitation Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…An error of at least 20% in excitation temperatures, calculated from Boltzmann plot and the line-pair method, must be allowed. 11 The excitation temperatures obtained in this work agree within 10% of each other. The excitation temperature serves as a guide to the ability for the atom source to excite electronic transitions.…”
Section: B Excitation Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In 1975, the concept of temperature applied to high‐temperature excitation sources was considered, as were arc plasma jets . Following on from this, microwave plasma became a standard reactive species 'precursor' source in SIFT‐MS, and after Duan et al introduced their microwave‐induced plasma desorption ionization (MIPDI) source for ambient mass spectrometry, many groups used the afterglow of a 'surfatron' .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely applied technique is inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), which is nowadays a routine method for the quantitative determination of elements from solutions [4]. Nearly together with the ICP, in the 1970s, the microwave excitation sources had been developed and tested [5,6], which application possibilities were discussed in several papers so far [7][8][9][10][11]. The conventional MIP instruments operate on a lower electric capacity and gas flow compared to the ICPs, and their analytical performance is lower due to the lower thermal stability and matrix tolerance of the applied emission source [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%