1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00316-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma endothelin levels and vascular responses at different temporal stages of streptozotocin diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
2
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
21
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Some works in streptozotocininduced diabetic rats do not report any impairment of endothelium-derived relaxations in isolated aortic segments during the first 2 weeks after diabetes was induced [49,50]. Using the same diabetic model, other studies on intestinal arterioles [43] or hindquarter haemodynamics [7] indicate endothelial dysfunction 8 to 14 days after streptozotocin administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works in streptozotocininduced diabetic rats do not report any impairment of endothelium-derived relaxations in isolated aortic segments during the first 2 weeks after diabetes was induced [49,50]. Using the same diabetic model, other studies on intestinal arterioles [43] or hindquarter haemodynamics [7] indicate endothelial dysfunction 8 to 14 days after streptozotocin administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely reported that RAS is implicated in hemodynamic maladaptations of the diabetic kidney [21,22,28] , and the changes of ACE, ACE2, as well as Ang II, have been investigated in STZ-induced diabetic rats [23][24][25] . Previous investigations have shown that Ang (1-7) serves a protective role by counteracting the effects of locally-generated Ang II in cardiovascular research [26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, specifically the combination of DM and an atherogenic diet appears to alter ET-1 responsiveness. In contrast, other DM animal models have reported enhanced ET-1 vascular responsiveness (31,55,56), also in the coronary circulation (8,61). These differences between DM models are not readily explained but may involve differences in vascular beds (55,56), genetically modified strains (8,55,56), and different temporal stages of DMinduction with subsequent other metabolic alterations (31, 61).…”
Section: H90 Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction In a Porcine Dm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%