2014
DOI: 10.1117/1.oe.53.5.051515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma enhancement of femtosecond laser-induced electromagnetic pulses at metal and dielectric surfaces

Abstract: Abstract. In a previous report, we have shown that the long wavelength, electromagnetic-pulsed (EMP) energy generated by ultrashort (38 fs) laser pulse ablation of a metal target is enhanced by an order of magnitude due to a preplasma generated by a different, 14-ns-long laser pulse. Here, we further investigate this EMP enhancement effect in a 2-to 16-GHz microwave region with different target materials and laser parameters. Specifically, we show a greater than two orders of magnitude enhancement to the EMP e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Summarizing, we performed measurements of the target neutralization current, the total target charge and the tangential component of the magnetic field of the resulting electromagnetic pulse for the laser energies ranging from 45 mJ to 92 mJ, with to pulse duration approximately 40 fs, and for the pulse durations ranging from 39 fs to 1000 fs, with the laser energy approximately 90 mJ. We found that values obtained for the 1 mm Cu target are visibly higher than values obtained in previous experiments [7,8] for the 3 mm Cu target, which we argue is a manifestation of a strong dependence on the laser contrast and hence on the amount of preplasma (the sensitivity of EMP to the presence of preplasma was noted in [16]). We also found that measurements for 6 µm Al foils give visibly higher results than for the thick Cu targets, which is especially true for pulse durations longer than 100 fs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Summarizing, we performed measurements of the target neutralization current, the total target charge and the tangential component of the magnetic field of the resulting electromagnetic pulse for the laser energies ranging from 45 mJ to 92 mJ, with to pulse duration approximately 40 fs, and for the pulse durations ranging from 39 fs to 1000 fs, with the laser energy approximately 90 mJ. We found that values obtained for the 1 mm Cu target are visibly higher than values obtained in previous experiments [7,8] for the 3 mm Cu target, which we argue is a manifestation of a strong dependence on the laser contrast and hence on the amount of preplasma (the sensitivity of EMP to the presence of preplasma was noted in [16]). We also found that measurements for 6 µm Al foils give visibly higher results than for the thick Cu targets, which is especially true for pulse durations longer than 100 fs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Chen et al [8] reported the microwave emission generated by a laser pulse incident on a metallic disc surface had a frequency ranges from 0.5 GHz to 4 GHz. Moreover, the fs laser pulse inducing EMP can be enhanced by a long (ns) laser pulse due to the formation of pre-plasma [9].…”
Section: Photonic Sensors 250mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a complete quantitative understanding of this phenomenon is still lacking. The EMP effect continues to attract considerable attention and is now being investigated also with the use of smaller laser facilities (Aspiotis et al, 2006;Miragliotta et al, 2011; Consoli et al, 2013;Dubois et al, 2014;De Marco et al, 2014;Cikhardt et al, 2014;Varma et al, 2014; Poyé et al, 2015a; Poyé et al, 2015b;Price et al, 2015; Consoli et al, 2015aConsoli et al, , 2015b Consoli et al, , 2016 De Marco et al, 2016, 2017Yi et al, 2016;Robinson et al, 2017;Krása et al, 2017a). In particular, a series of recent articles (Dubois et al, 2014; Poyé et al, 2015a; Poyé et al, 2015b) concentrated on the effect of electromagnetic emission related to the target neutralization current, which is of pulsed nature and which appears as a consequence of the laser-induced electric polarization of the target (Pearlman & Dahlbacka, 1977;Benjamin et al, 1979;Beg et al, 2004;Quinn et al, 2009;Krása et al, 2015;Krása et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%