2010
DOI: 10.1080/10420151003715457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma mirror and temperature evolution for short pulse KrF lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 8 W/cm 2 after 3 passes in the amplifier) the reflectivity drops below 50% [16] in agreement with the early observations of Fedosejevs et al [14]. The nearly perpendicular angle of incidence is needed as well, because in the first plasma-mirror experiments with the KrF laser [17] the angle of incidence was 45°and the reflectivity was as low as 30%. The shot-to-shot variation of reflectivity is attributed to the beam quality nonuniformities due to the shot-to-shot variation of the discharge-pump of the laser.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…10 8 W/cm 2 after 3 passes in the amplifier) the reflectivity drops below 50% [16] in agreement with the early observations of Fedosejevs et al [14]. The nearly perpendicular angle of incidence is needed as well, because in the first plasma-mirror experiments with the KrF laser [17] the angle of incidence was 45°and the reflectivity was as low as 30%. The shot-to-shot variation of reflectivity is attributed to the beam quality nonuniformities due to the shot-to-shot variation of the discharge-pump of the laser.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Increasing the intensity from 10 15 to 10 18 W cm −2 , the reflectivity shows a monotonic decrease. Note that former plasma mirror experiments performed with KrF lasers where increasing reflectivity was measured for the 45°angle of incidence showed saturation above 10 14 W cm −2 and a strong decrease above 10 15 W cm −2 intensity [30]. In the present work, however, the reflectivity drops below 10% above 10 18 W cm −2 , i.e.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…One of the most efficient methods to remove prepulses is based on the self-induced plasma shuttering or plasma mirror technique [6], which was successfully demonstrated for short-pulse KrF laser systems, too [7]. If the intensity of the laser pulse falling onto a transparent solid material is chosen so that only the leading edge of the main pulse is above the plasma formation threshold, prepulses or the pedestal of lower intensity will be suppressed, improving the contrast up to several orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%