2010
DOI: 10.2174/138620710790596745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Protein Binding in Drug Discovery and Development

Abstract: This review describes methods for quantifying the binding of small molecule drug candidates to plasma proteins and the application of these methods in drug discovery and development. Particular attention is devoted to methods amenable to medium-to-high throughput analysis and those well suited for measurement of compounds that are highly protein bound. The methods reviewed herein include the conventional techniques of equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration and ultracentrifugation, as well as some more novel app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
125
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
125
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, no clear correlation with plasma albumin concentrations was measurable (58). Remarkably, the voriconazole PPB values were highly deviant from our previously published in vitro data, from the data published by Roffey et al (59), and from the results in this study, which were all generated by ED, in our opinion still the gold standard in determining protein binding of drugs (34,(60)(61)(62). Moreover, the most important factors possibly influencing the performance of the ED procedure, such as environmental temperature, pH, mass balance, and volume shift, were ruled out (23), resulting in a robust and reliable method for determining voriconazole PPB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Overall, no clear correlation with plasma albumin concentrations was measurable (58). Remarkably, the voriconazole PPB values were highly deviant from our previously published in vitro data, from the data published by Roffey et al (59), and from the results in this study, which were all generated by ED, in our opinion still the gold standard in determining protein binding of drugs (34,(60)(61)(62). Moreover, the most important factors possibly influencing the performance of the ED procedure, such as environmental temperature, pH, mass balance, and volume shift, were ruled out (23), resulting in a robust and reliable method for determining voriconazole PPB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The samples were left to equilibrate at 37°C but a temperature controlled centrifuge was not available meaning that the sample temperature would have dropped somewhat during ultrafiltration. The fu of some drugs has been reported to rise with increasing temperature [20], but this is unlikely to be a significant issue in our study since previous reports used higher temperatures, and our fu values were slightly larger. Further, pH was not controlled, which is frequently the case with ultrafiltration [21].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…As a result, membrane binding and fluid shifts need not be considered. Following centrifugation, a sample partitions into three layers: a top layer containing very-low-density lipoproteins and chylomicrons; a middle aqueous layer, which is protein free; and a bottom layer, which contains larger plasma proteins and lipoproteins (50). f U can be calculated by comparing the C T obtained prior to centrifugation and the C U obtained from the aqueous, middle layer.…”
Section: Protein Binding Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f U can be calculated by comparing the C T obtained prior to centrifugation and the C U obtained from the aqueous, middle layer. A major disadvantage of the method is that it is relatively low throughput, limiting how many samples may be processed at once (50).…”
Section: Protein Binding Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%