1980
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.45.723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Shifts of Hydrogenic-Ion Lines

Abstract: Systematic red shifts for the Paschen ot, (3, and y lines (n = 4,5, 6~*n = 3) of Hen are observed over an electron density range of (1-8) x lo 22 m" 3 . The measurements are compared with combined estimates for plasma polarization and ion quadrupole effects. It is demonstrated that previous theoretical estimates have left out an important contribution to the polarization shift, which we estimate using the Debye model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
18
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case there are not so many data points to compare with at least in the interval of electron densities considered, from 10 22 to 1.5 × 10 23 m −3 . In relation to other experimental measurements, very good agreement is found now with one datum from Pittman et al (1980) showing this result differences lower than 10% with ours, possibly the most optimistic estimation of uncertainty in this kind of measurement and experiment. Once more, comparisons with theoretical calculations reveal very good agreement between our data and those by Kepple (1972) and by Stehlé (1994) although differences with those by Griem et al (1962) are also lower than the 15% of the uncertainty estimated for our results.…”
Section: P β Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case there are not so many data points to compare with at least in the interval of electron densities considered, from 10 22 to 1.5 × 10 23 m −3 . In relation to other experimental measurements, very good agreement is found now with one datum from Pittman et al (1980) showing this result differences lower than 10% with ours, possibly the most optimistic estimation of uncertainty in this kind of measurement and experiment. Once more, comparisons with theoretical calculations reveal very good agreement between our data and those by Kepple (1972) and by Stehlé (1994) although differences with those by Griem et al (1962) are also lower than the 15% of the uncertainty estimated for our results.…”
Section: P β Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The influence of self-absorption found by these authors should be probably considered only for electron densities lower than 0.4 × 10 23 m −3 . Agreement is not so good with Piel (1984) or Pittman et al (1980), the differences with Bacon (1977) being around 50%. The latter calculated the electron density from the HeI 388.9 nm Stark halfwidth.…”
Section: P α Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated P a line profiles are compared with recent high density plasma experiments [7] and lower density data from previous measurements [8,9], covering more than a two-decade range of electron density N e with an associated 2 orders of magnitude change in the transition full width at half maximum (FWHM). The present calculations are seen to be in good overall agreement with experiment, except at the highest densities, where the discrepancy is a measure of the accuracy of the standard model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasma temperature varies between 34 000 and 87 000 K, and proton or He 1 perturbers are involved, depending on the particular experiment. The experiment of Pittman et al [8] was performed in a pure helium plasma with T e of the order of 4 eV. The data of Stefanovic et al [9] was acquired in a plasma with predominantly proton perturbers at T e 3.27 eV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%