40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-5103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Synthetic Jet for Flow Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under conditions of same exit area, orifice shape has little influence on the variation of the exit velocity. Hardy et al 2010;Anderson and Knight 2012;Greene et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under conditions of same exit area, orifice shape has little influence on the variation of the exit velocity. Hardy et al 2010;Anderson and Knight 2012;Greene et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, discharge energy has a dominant influence on PSJA performance [14][15][16]. With increasing discharge energy, peak jet velocity, jet duration time, pulsed thrust (impulse), and jet-affected area, increase respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the simulation results of the temperature and the velocity are over-predicted. From the experiments of the active flow control with the PSJ, it can be found that the measured jet velocity is much lower than that of the numerical simulation (Haack et al, 2008;Caruana et al, 2009;Hardy et al, 2010). In the experiment, the actuator works continuously, but almost all the simulations of the PSJ are for a one-pulsed jet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%