2005
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800355
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmablastic lymphomas and plasmablastic plasma cell myelomas have nearly identical immunophenotypic profiles

Abstract: Plasmablastic lymphoma is an aggressive neoplasm that shares many cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic features with plasmablastic plasma cell myeloma. However, plasmablastic lymphoma is listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification as a variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. To characterize the relationship between plasmablastic lymphoma and plasmablastic plasma cell myeloma, we performed immunohistochemistry using a large panel of B-cell and plasma cell markers on nine cases of plasmablasti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
308
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
20
308
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of c-MYC rearrangement has been reported in 15% of cases of multiple myeloma or primary plasma cell leukemia in a study by Avet-Loiseau et al 20 Although plasmablastic myeloma and plasmablastic lymphoma can be indistinguishable by immunophenotype and morphology, the strong cyclin D1 positivity and absence of Epstein-Barr virus support the diagnosis of plasmablastic myeloma over plasmablastic lymphoma in this case. 21 In the low-grade B-cell lymphoma, we demonstrated a higher percentage of cells showing IGH/BCL2 fusion signals than c-MYC rearrangement, raising the possibility of c-MYC rearrangement as a secondary event. However, as the FISH analyses were performed on two separate peripheral blood smears, and the conventional cytogenetics showed all of the evaluated metaphases contained either both abnormalities, or neither abnormality, we were unable to confirm this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The presence of c-MYC rearrangement has been reported in 15% of cases of multiple myeloma or primary plasma cell leukemia in a study by Avet-Loiseau et al 20 Although plasmablastic myeloma and plasmablastic lymphoma can be indistinguishable by immunophenotype and morphology, the strong cyclin D1 positivity and absence of Epstein-Barr virus support the diagnosis of plasmablastic myeloma over plasmablastic lymphoma in this case. 21 In the low-grade B-cell lymphoma, we demonstrated a higher percentage of cells showing IGH/BCL2 fusion signals than c-MYC rearrangement, raising the possibility of c-MYC rearrangement as a secondary event. However, as the FISH analyses were performed on two separate peripheral blood smears, and the conventional cytogenetics showed all of the evaluated metaphases contained either both abnormalities, or neither abnormality, we were unable to confirm this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In our analysis, the overall survival of these two stages did not statistically differ. Several reasons that may account for this unexpected finding include: (1) differences in treatment between these two stages (e.g., a more aggressive and effective treatment of stage IV disease may offset its inherently worse prognosis than stage I disease), (2) inaccuracy in diagnosing or staging of PBL, (3) biological aggressiveness of lymphomas with plasmablastic morphology [43], (4) similarities of PBL with plasma cell myeloma [44] (e.g., myeloma staging and therapy differ greatly from those of lymphoma), (5) the retrospective nature and limitations of our data, and (6) inadequate reporting of survival in the analyzed articles. Because of these shortcomings, HIV-associated PBL cases should be followed prospectively to observe the outcome of these patients in the HAART era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relatively low incidence of plasma cell malignancies in HIV+ patients, plasmablastic plasmacytoma or myeloma, should be included in the differential diagnosis. A study published by Vega et al was not able to reliably distinguish between PBL and plasmablastic plasma cell myeloma by morphology and immunohistochemistry alone, since no statistically significant difference in frequency of lymphoid and plasma cell-related markers was seen between these malignancies [11]. All cases showed strong uniform expression of the post-germinal center associated B-cell-and plasma cell-associated markers MUM-1, CD38 and CD138.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%