2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmapheresis, Photopheresis, and Endovenous Immunoglobulin in Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, DFPP is implemented in some centers in preconditioning regimens for antibody-incompatible kidney transplantation (AB0i [18] and/or HLAi [19]). Earlier, in a study by Pretagostini and others [20], DFPP was compared with IA for treatment of ABMR and found comparably both effective in resolving ABMR and safe. As demonstrated in the study by Eskandary et al [17], a combination treatment of DFPP + IA appeared to be more effective in clearing IgM antibodies and complement factors, particularly C1q, compared to IA alone in a preconditioning regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, DFPP is implemented in some centers in preconditioning regimens for antibody-incompatible kidney transplantation (AB0i [18] and/or HLAi [19]). Earlier, in a study by Pretagostini and others [20], DFPP was compared with IA for treatment of ABMR and found comparably both effective in resolving ABMR and safe. As demonstrated in the study by Eskandary et al [17], a combination treatment of DFPP + IA appeared to be more effective in clearing IgM antibodies and complement factors, particularly C1q, compared to IA alone in a preconditioning regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IA can faster to remove DSA than DFPP [45], and compared to plasmapheresis, IA allows not only a more specific but also a more effective clearance of circulating immunoglobulins without the side effects associated with the substitution of FFP or albumin [46,47]. However, the higher costs associated with the use of IA indicates its use in high-risk populations (i.e., hyperimmune or ABO-I patients, pretransplantcross-match positivity, AAMR) [38]. Therefore, we suggest that DFPP aimed at AMR is significantly effective, cheap, and at low risks of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined therapy consisting of steroid pulses, IVIG, TPE and rituximab had been proved to be effective. More recently, Pretagostini et al [38] compared retrospectively 23 transplanted patients (group A) treated with protein-A IA versus 7 patients (group B) with DFPP. They had observed that the 2 extracorporeal procedures had similar effects in terms of graft survival, DSA removal, and cross-match negativity (group A 74 vs. 86%; 95 vs. 100%).…”
Section: Antibody-mediated Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В большинство протоколов входят различные варианты ПА. Дальнейшим развитием методики ПА стала каскадная плазмофильтрация (КПФ) -метод селективного удаления молекул определенной молекулярной массы, участвующих в реакции отторжения (антител, компонентов системы комплемента) [14,15]. Мы провели исследование по оценке целесообразности включения данного весьма дорогостоящего метода в схему десенсибилизации реципиентов с невысоким уровнем сенсибилизации.…”
Section: терапевтический архив 8 2016unclassified