2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmaspheric hiss properties: Observations from Polar

Abstract: In the region between L = 2 to 7 at all Magnetic Local Time (MLTs) plasmaspheric hiss was detected 32% of the time. In the limited region of L = 3 to 6 and 15 to 21 MLT (dusk sector), the wave percentage detection was the highest (51%). The latter plasmaspheric hiss is most likely due to energetic~10-100 keV electrons drifting into the dusk plasmaspheric bulge region. On average, plasmaspheric hiss intensities are an order of magnitude larger on the dayside than on the nightside. Plasmaspheric hiss intensities… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
132
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
14
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many models assume featureless, broadband hiss, which does not accurately describe pitchangle scattering of electrons due to coherent, dispersive hiss waves. Coherent hiss waveforms are most prevalent during times when the plasmasphere is driven by solar wind or magnetosheath ULF pressure fluctuations 19 , similar to what produces the large-scale coherence for the 6 January conjunction.…”
Section: Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Many models assume featureless, broadband hiss, which does not accurately describe pitchangle scattering of electrons due to coherent, dispersive hiss waves. Coherent hiss waveforms are most prevalent during times when the plasmasphere is driven by solar wind or magnetosheath ULF pressure fluctuations 19 , similar to what produces the large-scale coherence for the 6 January conjunction.…”
Section: Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to expect the location of the plasmapause and density structure of the plasmasphere to strongly influence hiss wave power spatial distribution, and authors have recognized this for many years [e.g., Thorne et al, 1973]. Instead, they sorted hiss wave power using a combination magnetic local time (MLT), magnetic latitude (MLAT), geomagnetic activity (Kp, Dst, AE, or AE*), and L parameter (MacIlwain L, dipole L, or L*) [e.g., Meredith et al, 2004Meredith et al, , 2007Glauert et al, 2014;Orlova et al, 2014;Tsurutani et al, 2015]. Instead, they sorted hiss wave power using a combination magnetic local time (MLT), magnetic latitude (MLAT), geomagnetic activity (Kp, Dst, AE, or AE*), and L parameter (MacIlwain L, dipole L, or L*) [e.g., Meredith et al, 2004Meredith et al, , 2007Glauert et al, 2014;Orlova et al, 2014;Tsurutani et al, 2015].…”
Section: 1002/2016gl069982mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reviews of hiss observations, see Hayakawa and Sazhin [1992], Bortnik et al [2009], and the introduction to Tsurutani et al [2015]. These waves are characteristically broadband, spanning several kHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background magnetic field strength and the cold electron density determine the wave dispersion relation, and the resonant particles contribute to growth or decay of the whistler-mode emissions. Li et al, 2015;Tsurutani et al, 2015), leak from the dayside high-latitude plasmapause, and finally become the exohiss emissions (Gao et al, 2018;Zhu et al, 2015). A plausible scenario is that the chorus emissions at larger radial distances propagate into the plasmasphere, evolve into the plasmaspheric hiss emissions (Bortnik et al, 2008;Falkowski et al, 2017;W.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%