2019
DOI: 10.1101/gr.241299.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmid detection and assembly in genomic and metagenomic data sets

Abstract: Although plasmids are important for bacterial survival and adaptation, plasmid detection and assembly from genomic, let alone metagenomic, samples remain challenging. The recently developed plasmidSPAdes assembler addressed some of these challenges in the case of isolate genomes but stopped short of detecting plasmids in metagenomic assemblies, an untapped source of yet to be discovered plasmids. We present the metaplasmidSPAdes tool for plasmid assembly in metagenomic data sets that reduced the false positive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
12

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
123
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the key advantage of mosaicFlye over existing assembly tools lies in reconstructing the accurate sequences of repeat copies and a relatively small reduction in the number of contigs. However, these improvements are important, for example, long bacterial repeats often correspond to important sequences such as 16s rRNAs (Yuan et al, Bioinformatics 2015) or antibiotic resistance genes (Antipov et al, 2019). To benchmark mosaicFlye, we applied it to multiple datasets with complex repeats that the state-of-the-art long-read genome assemblers failed to resolve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the key advantage of mosaicFlye over existing assembly tools lies in reconstructing the accurate sequences of repeat copies and a relatively small reduction in the number of contigs. However, these improvements are important, for example, long bacterial repeats often correspond to important sequences such as 16s rRNAs (Yuan et al, Bioinformatics 2015) or antibiotic resistance genes (Antipov et al, 2019). To benchmark mosaicFlye, we applied it to multiple datasets with complex repeats that the state-of-the-art long-read genome assemblers failed to resolve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bioinformatic tools have been recently developed to overcome this challenge in short-read sequencing. Examples of them are PlasmidFinder, cBar, PLACNET, (meta)plasmidSPAdes, recycler, plasflow, MOB-suite, mlplasmids, plaScope, gplas, plasClass, plasGUN,SCAPP, metaviralSPAdes ( Zhou and Xu, 2010 ; Carattoli et al., 2014 ; Rozov et al., 2017 ; Vielva et al., 2017 ; Arredondo-Alonso et al., 2018 ; Arredondo-Alonso et al., 2020 ; Krawczyk et al., 2018 ; Robertson and Nash, 2018 ; Royer et al., 2018 ; Antipov et al., 2019 , 2020 ; Fang et al., 2020 ; Pellow et al., 2020a , Pellow et al., 2020b ; Pellow et al., 2020 , 2020 ). These tools identify plasmids and viruses in metagenomic samples or bacterial isolates in a variety of ways, ranging from the simpler approach of blasting against a plasmid database (PlasmidFinder, MOB-suite) to the use of more complex deep neural networks (cBar, PlasFlow).…”
Section: Methods For Mobile Genetic Elements Analysis In Environmentamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of tools that can be used to assemble or detect plasmids in isolate bacterial samples, such as plasmidSPAdes (Antipov et al, 2016), PlasmidFinder (Carattoli et al, 2014), cBar (Zhou and Xu, 2010), gPlas (Arredondo-Alonso et al, 2019), and others. However, there are currently only two tools that attempt to reconstruct complete plasmid sequences in metagenomic samples: Recycler (Rozov et al, 2017) and metaplasmidSPAdes (Antipov et al, 2019). Here we present SCAPP (Sequence Contents Aware Plasmid Peeler), a new algorithm building on Recycler that leverages external biological knowledge about plasmid sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%