1990
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.174-3-993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasminogen Activators: Pharmacology and Therapy

Abstract: Biochemical advances are providing new insights into coagulation and fibrinolysis. Integrating this biochemical knowledge into plasminogen activator therapy improves understanding of currently available enzymes. Basic components of the fibrinolytic system are discussed and the chemical structures, pharmacokinetics, dosages, and modes of delivery of current and future plasminogen activators are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these proteases are fibrinolytic enzymes capable of digesting fibrin (Fujita et al 1993;Jeong et al 2004;Leonardi et al 2002;Sumi et al 1995;Wong and Mine 2004). The fibrinolytic agents available today for clinical use are mostly plasminogen activators (Holden 1990), such as tissue-type plasminogen activator, urokinase-type plasminogen activator and the bacterial plasminogen activator, streptokinase. In spite of their widespread use, these agents display low specificity to fibrin and cause undesired side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these proteases are fibrinolytic enzymes capable of digesting fibrin (Fujita et al 1993;Jeong et al 2004;Leonardi et al 2002;Sumi et al 1995;Wong and Mine 2004). The fibrinolytic agents available today for clinical use are mostly plasminogen activators (Holden 1990), such as tissue-type plasminogen activator, urokinase-type plasminogen activator and the bacterial plasminogen activator, streptokinase. In spite of their widespread use, these agents display low specificity to fibrin and cause undesired side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the two agents produce similar patency rates, TNK-t-PA is easier to administer because it has a half-life 8.5-fold longer than that of t-PA (21). Consequently, TNK-t-PA can be given as a single intravenous bolus, whereas t-PA must be given by bolus followed by an infusion (22)(23)(24)(25). The longer half-life of TNK-t-PA, relative to t-PA, is the result of two mutations introduced into the first kringle of t-PA: removal of the high mannose carbo-hydrate at position 117 by substitution of asparagine with glutamine (N117Q, abbreviated N) 2 and creation of a new glycosylation site by replacement of the threonine residue at position 103 with an asparagine (T103N, abbreviated T) (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas tPA promotes plasmin-mediated fibrinolysis, dissolving clot, heparin is an anticoagulant acting on the intrinsic pathway, inhibiting coagulation and preventing thrombus progression without leading to its dissolution. The biological half-life of tPA and intravenous heparin is approximately 8 and 60 minutes, respectively (34,35). Whereas tPA is the active medication used to treat PE, heparin is also delivered at a low dose to prevent clot formation in and around access sheaths and catheters.…”
Section: Contraindications To Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 99%