“…Longitudinal studies in humans suggest that competition and immunity mainly affect parasite density, not the time to clearance (Sama et al, 2006); apparent loss of particular genotypes is common, as densities drop below detection limits. Molecular genotyping has confirmed the expectations that 'mixed infections must be the rule ... in localities with even moderate transmission rate' (Babiker et al, 2000;Hackett, 1941;Peyerl-Hoffmann et al, 2001;Sallenave-Sales et al, 2000), that superinfection occurs more commonly in areas of higher transmission (Arnot, 1998), that novel genotypes infecting otherwise immune children give rise to symptomatic infections (Contamin et al, 1996), and that introductions of new phenotypes can cause epidemics of clinical malaria (Arez et al, 1999;Laserson et al, 1999). There is less evidence from these studies of small-scale variations in genotype frequencies that might lead to exposure to new strains after travelling 'relatively short distances in Africa' (Bray et al, 1962), but such variations have been observed in remote South American villages (Machado et al, 2004), suggesting that human population movements can create mosaics of local parasite diversity at various spatial scales.…”