2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.035418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmonic shock waves and solitons in a nanoring

Abstract: We apply the hydrodynamic theory of electron liquid to demonstrate that a circularly polarized radiation induces the diamagnetic, helicity-sensitive dc current in a ballistic nanoring. This current is dramatically enhanced in the vicinity of plasmonic resonances. The resulting magnetic moment of the nanoring represents a giant increase of the inverse Faraday effect. With increasing radiation intensity, linear plasmonic excitations evolve into the strongly non-linear plasma shock waves. These excitations produc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, a static magnetic field is created inside the nanoparticle during the laser pulse. In future studies, it would be interesting to study other geometries such has nano-rings, since a resonant inverse Faraday effect was recently predicted in such nanostructures [27,58]. The computed induced magnetic moments in the nanoparticle are quite large, of about 0.35 µ B /atom for a laser intensity of 45 × 10 10 W/cm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As a result, a static magnetic field is created inside the nanoparticle during the laser pulse. In future studies, it would be interesting to study other geometries such has nano-rings, since a resonant inverse Faraday effect was recently predicted in such nanostructures [27,58]. The computed induced magnetic moments in the nanoparticle are quite large, of about 0.35 µ B /atom for a laser intensity of 45 × 10 10 W/cm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Generation of stationary magnetic moment by a circularly polarized radiation is commonly referred to as the inverse Faraday effect (IFE) predicted by Pitaevskii [1] and first observed by van der Ziel et al [2]. Although this effect is usually studied in magnetic materials [3][4][5], it can be also observed in conventional semiconductor nanostructures such as quantum dots and nanorings [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In particular, it was recently predicted [14,15] that a circularly polarized radiation with the electric component E = E ω exp(−iωt) + c.c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this effect is usually studied in magnetic materials [3][4][5], it can be also observed in conventional semiconductor nanostructures such as quantum dots and nanorings [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In particular, it was recently predicted [14,15] that a circularly polarized radiation with the electric component E = E ω exp(−iωt) + c.c. can excite a circular dc current in a nanoring, which, in turn, generates a magnetic moment…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) which determines the width of the narrow boundary layer, where viscosity‐related friction dominates over γ. We also assume that the width of the channel is sufficiently large, WLG. This condition allows to neglect the effects related to the friction of the viscous electron fluid within the narrow Gurzhi layer (LG) at the boundaries of the sample (for a more detailed discussion of effect of finite viscosity on plasmonic oscillations and transport see, respectively, refs. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This condition can be easily fulfilled for clean samples. In particular, for GaAs with mobility 10 5 cm V −1 s −1 at temperature about 30 K this condition is well satisfied for not too large concentrations N3×1012cnormalm2 . The hydrodynamic equations describing an electronic fluid in FET channel read vt+υvx+γv=emUx, Ut+true(Uvtrue)x=0 where υ is the velocity of the electronic fluid, and U is the local value of the gate‐to‐channel voltage, which, in the gradual channel approximation, is related to the local value of the electron concentration as Ntrue(xtrue)=CUtrue(xtrue)/e .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%