2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic and metal ingestion in three species of coastal waterfowl wintering in Atlantic Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports showing the presence of plastics in the guts of freshwater waterbirds are scarce and among the species analyzed the highest plastic prevalence has been found in seabirds (Provencher et al, 2015). However, English et al (2015) have discovered a high prevalence of plastic in Table 1 Presence of plastic debris in faeces of three waterfowl species collected in several lakes of Central Spain. Plastic remains have been classified in two types, fragments and threads, defined according to van Franeker et al, 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports showing the presence of plastics in the guts of freshwater waterbirds are scarce and among the species analyzed the highest plastic prevalence has been found in seabirds (Provencher et al, 2015). However, English et al (2015) have discovered a high prevalence of plastic in Table 1 Presence of plastic debris in faeces of three waterfowl species collected in several lakes of Central Spain. Plastic remains have been classified in two types, fragments and threads, defined according to van Franeker et al, 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Information about the incidence of remains of plastics in the stomach of waterfowl and other species living in wetlands is apparently lacking (Provencher et al, 2015;Wagner et al, 2014; but see English et al, 2015), despite plastic debris being also present in some wetlands. Microplastic and coal ash have been observed in the Lau…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of these papers reported plastic ingestion in groups of species that were not sampled with plastic trophic studies in mind. For example, there are a number of papers that reported plastic ingestion via opportunistic sampling of seabirds (Avery-Gomm et al 2013;Codina-García et al 2013;English et al 2015;Holland et al 2016). While this type of reporting of plastic ingestion is important for understanding what species are vulnerable (Provencher et al 2017), this type of sampling is not conducive to examining questions related to trophic transfer because the time and locations of sampling can be disparate, and the species may not be directly connected in a food web.…”
Section: Species and Trophic Levels Examined For Plastic Ingestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic fragmentation results in a continuum of debris sizes , leading to microscopic and even nanometric fragments (Gigault et al, 2016). Thus ingestion concerns both the larger animals, like cetaceans (Lusher et al, 2013;Lusher et al, 2015), turtles (Schuyler et al, 2012), sea birds (English et al, 2015;Ryan, 2015;Wilcox et al, 2015), and the smaller ones, like fishes (Collard et al, 2015); even zooplankton are concerned (Cole et al, 2013;. It has been demonstrated that plastic ingestion can significantly alter the feeding capacity and decrease the reproductive output of organisms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%