2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic anisotropy and ductile fracture of bake-hardened AA6013 aluminum sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of 10 MJ/m 3 is well-within the saturated regime. Similar findings are reported in the authors’ previous work on AA6013 [ 65 ].…”
Section: Plastic Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value of 10 MJ/m 3 is well-within the saturated regime. Similar findings are reported in the authors’ previous work on AA6013 [ 65 ].…”
Section: Plastic Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These observations justify the additional investment in calibrating and implementing more advanced yield criterion, instead of resorting to classical J 2 plasticity. Similar examples for other materials can be found in [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 71 , 72 ].
Figure A2 KBK anisotropy evaluation of ( a ) Yld2000-2d and ( b ) von Mises models.
…”
Section: Figure A1supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noted that the critical elements chosen to compare the strain evolution between simulation and experimental results were all in the middle region (i.e., element A marked in Fig. 12a-c) because the large deformation at the edge of specimen cannot be calculated successfully by DIC near the fracture stroke, which is also stated in the work of Lou and Huh [49] and Ha et al [45]. The comparison of strain evolution reveals that finite element models provide sufficient accuracy for the simulation of these specimens.…”
Section: Parameters Calibration For Fracture Criteriamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, seven material parameters ( 0 , 45 , 90 , b , r 0 , r 45 r 90 ) were used to calibrate the Yld1996 yield function, and then we could predict that r b is equal to 1.79 for AA6016-T4. The same way had also been successfully used in the research of Ha et al [45], who successfully employed Yld2000-2d yield function to generate enough data to calibrate Yld2004-18p yield model.…”
Section: Calibration Of Anisotropic Yield Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%