1969
DOI: 10.1115/1.3564714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic Failure of Fiber-Reinforced Materials

Abstract: The paper is concerned with failure by plastic flow of the matrix of a fiber-reinforced composite sheet. For unidirectional reinforcement, a completely general state of plane stress in the median plane of the sheet is discussed, but for a two-ply laminate with an arbitrary angle between the two systems of reinforcing fibers only simple tension in any direction to the fibers is investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where a and i are the stresses, c and y are the strains, X, Y and S are the longitudinal, transverse and shear strengths, prime (') denotes compressive strength, subscripts 1 and 2 denote longitudinal and transverse directions and U is the ultimate strength or strain. Stowell and Liu (1961), Kelly and Davies (1965), and Prager (1969) suggested additional variations of the maximum stress criterion.…”
Section: Phenomenological Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a and i are the stresses, c and y are the strains, X, Y and S are the longitudinal, transverse and shear strengths, prime (') denotes compressive strength, subscripts 1 and 2 denote longitudinal and transverse directions and U is the ultimate strength or strain. Stowell and Liu (1961), Kelly and Davies (1965), and Prager (1969) suggested additional variations of the maximum stress criterion.…”
Section: Phenomenological Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php particle reinforced composites has been studied [26,5,8,9,6,11,12,24,33,27,31,32,34,35,36,37,38,47,50,52,55,57,58,63].…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%