2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2003)129:8(774)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic Limit, Liquid Limit and Undrained Shear Strength of Soil—Reappraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
60
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, it has been well documented that, compared with the much-reduced concave curvatures of logarithm undrained strength against water content relationships ( Figure 11(b)), such relationships are nearly linear when presented on a bilogarithmic plot (Koumoto and Houlsby, 2001;Sharma and Bora, 2003), especially for soils having wide water content ranges under investigation and also for organic soils (O'Kelly 2014a(O'Kelly , 2016bZentar et al 2009). For instance, referring to Table 2, the bi-logarithmic data plots for the sewage sludge 1 and alum WTR 1-6 materials in Figure 11(c) generally gave higher coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values compared with the semilogarithmic plots of the same data in Figure 11(b).…”
Section: With Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Further, it has been well documented that, compared with the much-reduced concave curvatures of logarithm undrained strength against water content relationships ( Figure 11(b)), such relationships are nearly linear when presented on a bilogarithmic plot (Koumoto and Houlsby, 2001;Sharma and Bora, 2003), especially for soils having wide water content ranges under investigation and also for organic soils (O'Kelly 2014a(O'Kelly , 2016bZentar et al 2009). For instance, referring to Table 2, the bi-logarithmic data plots for the sewage sludge 1 and alum WTR 1-6 materials in Figure 11(c) generally gave higher coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values compared with the semilogarithmic plots of the same data in Figure 11(b).…”
Section: With Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…67 3 10 4 %/min during penetration of the freefalling 80 g-308 cone used in this study. Karlsson (1981), Wood (1985) and Sharma and Bora (2003) have reported experimentally derived K values, in order, of 0 . 80, 0 .…”
Section: Shear Strength Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82 using 308 cones with remoulded fine-grained mineral soils. Note that these experimental K values were calibrated against miniature vane data (Wood, 1985) and unconfined TC data (Sharma and Bora, 2003), for which the strain rate was approximately four orders of magnitude lower than that of the fall cone. The failure mechanism involved general shearing as the free-falling cone displaced the soil out of the way before coming to a stationary position.…”
Section: Shear Strength Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simply based on analysis of historical data, as the ratio of strengths at the PL and LL varies substantially between soils, these strength-based approaches can only coincidentally give correct PL values, actually measuring what might be termed the plastic strength limit (PL 100 ); that is the water content corresponding to s uFC ¼ 100 Â s uFC(LL) . Fall cone Belviso et al, 1985;Wasti, 1987;Harison, 1988;Feng, 2000Feng, , 2001Feng, , 2004Koumoto & Houlsby, 2001;Sharma & Bora, 2003;Lee & Freeman, 2009;Shimobe, 2010;Sivakumar et al, 2015), steady monotonic penetration (Stone & Phan, 1995;Stone & Kyambadde, 2007), fast-static loading (Sivakumar et al, 2009) and extrusion (Timár, 1974;Whyte, 1982;Medhat & Whyte, 1986;Kayabali & Tufenkci, 2010a, 2010bKayabali, 2011aKayabali, , 2011bKayabali, , 2012Kayabali et al, 2016) approaches for PL determination have all been suggested as alternatives to the standard thread-rolling approach. As mechanical tests, these strength-based approaches are seen by some researchers as means of achieving higher degrees of repeatability and reproducibility of results, although, to date, most fall-cone research has been conducted on well-behaved clay-rich soils that lie above the A-line on the standard plasticity chart.…”
Section: Strength-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%