2000
DOI: 10.2307/177282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic Phenotypic Response to Light of 16 Congeneric Shrubs from a Panamanian Rainforest

Abstract: Abstract. The comparative phenotypic plasticity of 16 species of tropical rainforest shrubs (genus Psychotria, Rubiaceae) was investigated by growing plants in three light environments on Barro Colorado Island (BCI, Panama). The three light environments gave daily photon flux densities (PPFD) similar to the natural light gradient from shaded forest understory to small and large canopy gaps. Six of the species are principally found in gaps or forest edge environments, whereas the other ten species are principal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
369
7
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(410 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
26
369
7
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf-level plasticity to light availability has been argued to be important for the survival and distribution of species along the successional gradients of forests (Bazzaz and Pickett 1980;Reich et al 1992Reich et al , 1999Abrams and Mostoller 1995). However, generally a whole plant growth strategy incorporating biomass allocation patterns, crown architecture and leaf photosynthesis and their interactive effect on carbon gain are important to understand plant growth and survival (Kitajima 1994;Valladares et al 2000). Studies of plant responses in a wider range of resources and stresses, or in habitats having seasonal changes of resources would deepen our understanding of the growth of individual plants, population dynamics, species distributions and mechanisms of succession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leaf-level plasticity to light availability has been argued to be important for the survival and distribution of species along the successional gradients of forests (Bazzaz and Pickett 1980;Reich et al 1992Reich et al , 1999Abrams and Mostoller 1995). However, generally a whole plant growth strategy incorporating biomass allocation patterns, crown architecture and leaf photosynthesis and their interactive effect on carbon gain are important to understand plant growth and survival (Kitajima 1994;Valladares et al 2000). Studies of plant responses in a wider range of resources and stresses, or in habitats having seasonal changes of resources would deepen our understanding of the growth of individual plants, population dynamics, species distributions and mechanisms of succession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective acquisition and efficient use of light can be critical especially for plants inhabiting the forest understorey where it is spatially and temporally variable and also strongly limiting to plant growth. When plants are grown under understorey light conditions there is indeed a strong convergence of morphological and physiological characteristics of gapand understorey-dependent species onto a shade plant syndrome (e.g., Pearcy and Sims 1994;Ackerly 1996;Chazdon et al 1996;Kitajima 1996;Valladares et al 2000). Differences remain between these contrasting groups or along the successional gradients (StraussDebendetti and Bazzaz 1996) but understanding their role in species habitat preference requires an integrative approach incorporating both morphology and physiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study species' SLAs and RMFs in 3.5% daylight were respectively 130-164% and 73-86% of those in 35% daylight, which reflect a moderate degree of plasticity if compared with those of 19 species of temperate woody deciduous seedlings raised a single season in 2-3% daylight and 17-65% daylight (mean values 155% and 82% for the increase of SLA and the reduction of RMF respectively; references for SLA and RMF values provided below). Such moderate morphological plasticity is typical for shade-tolerators (Grime 1979;Grubb 1998;Valladares et al 2000). It is possible that the lower vapor-pressure deficit in deeper shade compensates to a degree for the greater evaporative load resulting from a higher leaf area ratio.…”
Section: Seedling Tolerance Of Deep Shade Combined With Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along forest edges and in tree-fall gaps climbers build large curtains and reach their highest abundance (Pen˜alosa 1983;Uhl et al 1988), suppressing trees. Growing often in gaps, they exhibit typical features like high growth rates and rapid leaf turnover (Valladares et al 2000), probably accompanied by several other leaf traits. Negative impact on forest regeneration is strong as climbers reduce tree survival and re-growth by mechanical damages and shading (Putz 1984;Schnitzer and Bongers 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%