2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic Surgery: An Obstacle for Deep Face Recognition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [22] the authors collected a database of 900 individuals for analysing the effect of plastic surgery and found that the tested algorithms were unable to effectively account for the appearance changes caused by plastic surgery. More recently, Rathgeb et al showed in [23], using a database of mostly ICAO-quality face images [24] captured before and after various types of facial plastic surgeries, that different tested state-of-the-art face recognition systems maintained almost perfect verification performance at an operationally relevant threshold corresponding to a False Match Rate (FMR) of 0.1%. Numerous works have addressed the impact of temporary alterations on face recognition systems.…”
Section: B Facial Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] the authors collected a database of 900 individuals for analysing the effect of plastic surgery and found that the tested algorithms were unable to effectively account for the appearance changes caused by plastic surgery. More recently, Rathgeb et al showed in [23], using a database of mostly ICAO-quality face images [24] captured before and after various types of facial plastic surgeries, that different tested state-of-the-art face recognition systems maintained almost perfect verification performance at an operationally relevant threshold corresponding to a False Match Rate (FMR) of 0.1%. Numerous works have addressed the impact of temporary alterations on face recognition systems.…”
Section: B Facial Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Rathgeb et al. [21] introduced a new database of plastic surgery images which are mostly compliant with the ICAO quality requirements [22]. Using the new database as well as the database proposed in [20], Rathgeb et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that more work should be done towards designing algorithms capable of dealing with the appearance changes occurring as a result of a facial plastic surgery operation. More recently, Rathgeb et al [21] introduced a new database of plastic surgery images which are mostly compliant with the ICAO quality requirements [22]. Using the new database as well as the database proposed in [20], Rathgeb et al showed that the impact of plastic surgery on state-of-theart commercial and open-source face recognition systems is less significant than initially reported by other researchers.…”
Section: Physical Facial Manipulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that more work should be done towards designing algorithms capable of dealing with the appearance changes occurring as a result of a facial plastic surgery operation. More recently, Rathgeb et al [21] introduced a new database of plastic surgery images which are mostly compliant with the ICAO quality requirements [22]. Using the new database as well as the database proposed in [20], Rathgeb et al showed that the impact of plasticsurgery on state-of-the-art commercial and open-source face recognition systems is less significant than initially reported by other researchers.…”
Section: A Physical Facial Manipulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%