2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity after cognitive training reflected in prefrontal local field potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beta oscillations are readily detectible in other extracellular field recordings (such as EEG or MEG) and are also a reliable marker of underlying cognitive processes impacting neural circuit interactions, just as gamma oscillations are (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2011; Roux and Uhlhaas, 2014), including working memory and top-down control (Siegel et al, 2012; Helfrich and Knight, 2016). Consistent with the aforementioned animal studies (Singh et al, 2022; Singh et al, 2023), in our study, decrement of beta oscillations was detected during the task execution, and differed systematically between areas, at least around the time of stimulus presentations and early in the delay period of the task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beta oscillations are readily detectible in other extracellular field recordings (such as EEG or MEG) and are also a reliable marker of underlying cognitive processes impacting neural circuit interactions, just as gamma oscillations are (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2011; Roux and Uhlhaas, 2014), including working memory and top-down control (Siegel et al, 2012; Helfrich and Knight, 2016). Consistent with the aforementioned animal studies (Singh et al, 2022; Singh et al, 2023), in our study, decrement of beta oscillations was detected during the task execution, and differed systematically between areas, at least around the time of stimulus presentations and early in the delay period of the task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…During presentation of stimuli, correlated bottom-up inputs can serve to synchronize population neuronal spiking, and phases of synchronized excitation by pyramidal neurons followed by inhibition by interneurons can thus produce rhythmicity specifically in the gamma frequency range (Fries, 2009). Less precisely-timed or correlated inputs may fail to generate gamma oscillations, and indeed recent animal studies have suggested more prominent changes in the beta rather than gamma frequency range after learning to perform working memory tasks (Singh et al, 2022; Singh et al, 2023). Similarly, a recent human study of activation patterns in auditory working memory with intracranial recordings demonstrated that frontal and temporal regions with high decoding accuracy were not accompanied by significant increases in gamma power (Uluç et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then constructed a 3-way ANOVA model, with factors selective-partially-selective-nonselective sites; prefrontal subdivision; and task epoch. In every case, this analysis was performed for the gamma frequency band, de ned as 45-100 Hz; effects of training on other LFP properties have been reported elsewhere 12,13 . The animals were required to maintain center xation throughout both active and passive task trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An implicit assumption of these theories is that gamma band rhythmicity emerges as a result of active maintenance of working memory. However, recent studies suggest that robust gamma band power, in the 45-100 Hz range, during and after a stimulus presentation compared to the baseline, may be generated absent execution of a cognitive task, in subjects naïve to training, while subsequent training in fact decreases its magnitude 12,13 . This result is puzzling considering that activity of individual neurons is known to be affected by learning to perform such tasks in that a greater number of neurons are activated by stimuli after training 14,15 , their ring rate generally increases 16 , and so does their selectivity for stimuli 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%