2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-019-00345-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity and ductile fracture modeling of an Al–Si–Mg die-cast alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations justify the additional investment in calibrating and implementing more advanced yield criterion, instead of resorting to classical J 2 plasticity. Similar examples for other materials can be found in [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 71 , 72 ].
Figure A2 KBK anisotropy evaluation of ( a ) Yld2000-2d and ( b ) von Mises models.
…”
Section: Figure A1supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These observations justify the additional investment in calibrating and implementing more advanced yield criterion, instead of resorting to classical J 2 plasticity. Similar examples for other materials can be found in [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 71 , 72 ].
Figure A2 KBK anisotropy evaluation of ( a ) Yld2000-2d and ( b ) von Mises models.
…”
Section: Figure A1supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Hence, obtaining the stress as simply “force/area” only provides an average stress, which is not work-conjugate to the strains at the center of the test-section, as extracted from the DIC. The authors have proposed and applied on a large variety of materials a stress correction technique that is based on FE analysis [ 64 , 66 , 67 , 68 ]. Here, a FE model of 1/8 of the plane-strain tension specimen is created in Abaqus/Standard version 2018 (implicit solver), and meshed with quadratic, reduced integration elements (C3D20R).…”
Section: Plastic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eight anisotropic parameters α i=1∼8 are determined using the Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least-square algorithm. For the plane-strain tension, only the major stress component along the loading direction can be identified in the experiment (using the procedure detailed in [28][29][30][31]) and the minor one, transverse to the loading direction, is determined by the optimization with α i=1∼8 , with the plane-strain assumption (i.e., zero minor strain, transverse to the loading) [28][29][30]. The calibrated parameters for Calib1 and Calib2 are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Calibration Of Yld2000-2d Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative assessment of the performance of Calib1 and Calib2 in capturing all the experiments is shown in Figure 3, using the representation proposed by [34]. See also [27,29,30,35]. For each experiment, the orientation of the stress state with respect to a reference direction is computed as cos ω.…”
Section: Calibration Of Yld2000-2d Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%