2019
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity in Triticeae centromere DNA sequences: a wheat × tall wheatgrass (decaploid) model

Abstract: Centromeres mediate chromosome attachment to microtubules and maintain the integrity of chromosomes for proper segregation of the sister chromatids during cell division. Advances in the assembly of Triticeae genome sequences combined with the capacity to recover hybrid species derived from very distantly related species provides potential experimental systems for linking retrotransposon amplification and repositioning of centromeres via non-mendelian inheritance in partial amphiploid breeds. The decaploid tall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, in autopolyploids or paleo‐autopolyploids, such as poplar ( Populus trichocarpa ) and pear ( Pyrus bretschneideri ), subgenome dominance is absent and genes tend to be evenly lost between the two subgenomes (Li et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2017). In wheat, some rapid changes following polyploidization have been reported, including chromosomal rearrangements, epigenetic changes or TE‐related shift in centromere position (Badaeva, Dedkova, Pukhalskyi, & Zelenin, 2015; Dvorak et al., 2018; Jiao et al., 2018; Li et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2009; Shaked, Kashkush, Ozkan, Feldman, & Levy, 2001; Zhao et al., 2019). However, whether the wheat genome experiences subgenome dominance or biased fractionation is still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, in autopolyploids or paleo‐autopolyploids, such as poplar ( Populus trichocarpa ) and pear ( Pyrus bretschneideri ), subgenome dominance is absent and genes tend to be evenly lost between the two subgenomes (Li et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2017). In wheat, some rapid changes following polyploidization have been reported, including chromosomal rearrangements, epigenetic changes or TE‐related shift in centromere position (Badaeva, Dedkova, Pukhalskyi, & Zelenin, 2015; Dvorak et al., 2018; Jiao et al., 2018; Li et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2009; Shaked, Kashkush, Ozkan, Feldman, & Levy, 2001; Zhao et al., 2019). However, whether the wheat genome experiences subgenome dominance or biased fractionation is still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pericentromeric localization has been shown for CentSt, S17, and S170 from Ps. stipifolia [ 47 , 49 ]. STlib_117 signals from Ps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely used for karyotyping chromosomes, studying chromosomal rearrangements, and analyzing the genomic composition of allo- and autopolyploids and wide hybrids using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Comparative characteristics between Triticeae species can be studied by comparing the copy numbers of repeating elements [ 43 ], by comparing the distribution patterns across chromosomes and genomes [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], or by using a combination of both approaches [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CENH3 is an essential component of the kinetochore complex of active centromeres, and the mitotic interphase cells are ideal for demonstrating co-localization of CENH3 and centromere repetitive DNA sequences, although the centromere repeats may change extremely rapidly [ 41 , 42 ]. In wheat-alien interspecific hybridization, the wheat- Thinopyrum partial amphiploids containing typical centromeric repeats were well co-localized with CENH3 [ 43 ]. In the present study, the substitution line X479 displayed chromosomal distribution of CENH3 in wheat and the CENH3 peptide generated distinct signals in the centromeric regions of 1St and 4St-J S chromosomes ( Figure 5 a,c), as well as the progenies with 1StS.1BL, 1BS.1StL and 4BS.4J S L, which were detected using immunostaining experiments ( Figure 5 e).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%