Plasticity of the Arabidopsis Root System under Nutrient Deficiencies

Gruber, Benjamin D.; Giehl, Ricardo Fabiano Hettwer; Friedel, Swetlana; Wirén, Nicolaus von

doi:10.1104/pp.113.218453

Cited by 789 publications

(731 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

688

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We took a unique approach to integrating results from these two perspectives to uncover the molecular basis underlying individual plasticity and variation among natural variants. We focused on the root architectural system because it shows a high degree of plasticity under diverse environmental conditions (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). We used a quantitative phenotyping model to capture and integrate plastic changes in root system architecture in response to a range of experimental treatments within the laboratory reference accession Columbia-0 (Col-0).…”

Section: Integration Of Responses Within and Across Arabidopsis Naturmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of responses within and acrossArabidopsisnatural accessions uncovers loci controlling root systems architecture

Rosas

Cibrián-Jaramillo

Ristova

et al. 2013

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Significance Species display a range of plastic phenotypes that presumably have evolved as a result of adaptation to heterogeneous environments. We asked whether the genetic mechanisms that underlie adaptation across populations also determine the response of an individual plant to environmental cues in Arabidopsis . Using an integrative root phenotyping approach, genes that underlie natural variation in root architecture across populations were shown to control plasticity responses within an individual. Together, our results uncover a genetic mechanism underlying the phenotypic plasticity of an individual and phenotypic diversity across natural variants.

show abstract

Section: Integration Of Responses Within and Across Arabidopsis Naturmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of responses within and acrossArabidopsisnatural accessions uncovers loci controlling root systems architecture

Rosas

Cibrián-Jaramillo

Ristova

et al. 2013

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Root architecture can be modified to facilitate Pi uptake by favoring the development of lateral roots (at the expense of primary root elongation in many plants including Arabidopsis), increasing the density and length of root hairs, and limiting the development of aerial parts (López-Bucio et al, 2002;Svistoonoff et al, 2007;Gruber et al, 2013). Pi uptake mechanisms are enhanced at the root/soil interface, particularly through the stimulation of Pi transport activity (Mudge et al, 2002;Shin et al, 2004;Nussaume et al, 2011; Ayadi et al, 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Phosphate Fast-Responsive Genes PECP1 and PPsPase1 Affect Phosphocholine and Phosphoethanolamine Content

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phosphate starvation-mediated induction of the HAD-type phosphatases PPsPase1 (AT1G73010) and PECP1 (AT1G17710) has been reported in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). However, little is known about their in vivo function or impact on plant responses to nutrient deficiency. The preferences of PPsPase1 and PECP1 for different substrates have been studied in vitro but require confirmation in planta. Here, we examined the in vivo function of both enzymes using a reverse genetics approach. We demonstrated that PPsPase1 and PECP1 affect plant phosphocholine and phosphoethanolamine content, but not the pyrophosphate-related phenotypes. These observations suggest that the enzymes play a similar role in planta related to the recycling of polar heads from membrane lipids that is triggered during phosphate starvation. Altering the expression of the genes encoding these enzymes had no effect on lipid composition, possibly due to compensation by other lipid recycling pathways triggered during phosphate starvation. Furthermore, our results indicated that PPsPase1 and PECP1 do not influence phosphate homeostasis, since the inactivation of these genes had no effect on phosphate content or on the induction of molecular markers related to phosphate starvation. A combination of transcriptomics and imaging analyses revealed that PPsPase1 and PECP1 display a highly dynamic expression pattern that closely mirrors the phosphate status. This temporal dynamism, combined with the wide range of induction levels, broad expression, and lack of a direct effect on Pi content and regulation, makes PPsPase1 and PECP1 useful molecular markers of the phosphate starvation response.Plant growth is highly sensitive to a lack of phosphate (Pi); hence, the application of Pi fertilizers has become standard practice for high-throughput crop production (Cordell et al., 2009). Most phosphorus in the soil is not available to plants, as it is combined with other minerals or parts of organic compounds (Bieleski, 1973;Raghothama and Karthikeyan, 2005). Only a small fraction of soluble Pi (usually present at a concentration of ,10 mM in the soil) can be taken up by plants.Although growth is not optimal under limiting conditions, plants can withstand changing Pi concentrations within heterogeneous soils or in the external nutrient supply that can lead to reprogramming of their metabolism and architecture (Hammond et al., 2003;Péret et al., 2011;Plaxton and Tran, 2011). Root architecture can be modified to facilitate Pi uptake by favoring the development of lateral roots (at the expense of primary root elongation in many plants including Arabidopsis), increasing the density and length of root hairs, and limiting the development of aerial parts (López-Bucio et al., 2002;Svistoonoff et al., 2007;Gruber et al., 2013). Pi uptake mechanisms are enhanced at the root/soil interface, particularly through the stimulation of Pi transport activity (Mudge et al., 2002;Shin et al., 2004;Nussaume et al., 2011; Ayadi et al., 2015). In parallel, mobilization of Pi sources fr...

show abstract

“…8,9 The dynamic control of the overall root system architecture (RSA) throughout time finally determines root plasticity and allows plants to efficiently adapt to environmental constraints. 10 The soil-environment from which plants extract nutrients and water is extremely heterogeneous, both spatially and temporally. 11 Among the nutrients present in soil, nitrate (NO 3 − ) may vary by an order of magnitude within centimeters or over the course of a day.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…12 The effects of NO 3 − on the root system are complex and depend on several factors, such as the concentration available to the plant, the endogenous nitrogen status and the sensitivity of the species. 10,13,14 A considerable part of the studies aimed to unravel the mechanisms controlling RSA growth and development in response to nitrate have been focused on lateral roots (LR), 8,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20] while the nitrate-regulation of the primary root growth is still unclear. Beside NO 3 − , auxin has been demonstrated to strongly affect and control the LR development, [21][22][23][24] and an increasing number of studies suggests an overlap between auxin and NO 3 − signaling pathways in controlling LR development.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

NO signaling is a key component of the root growth response to nitrate inZea maysL.

Trevisan

Manoli

Quaggiotti

2014

Plant Signaling & Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To search for nutrients and water, roots need to efficiently explore large soil volumes. To this aim they generate complex root systems, allowing them to maximize their resource allocation efficiency. 1 Despite the vital importance of roots, the difficulty in accessing intact root systems for analysis, particularly under field conditions, have slowed down the breeding programs for plant's adaptation to environmental restrictions. 2,3 The capacity of plants to take up nutrients and water is mainly determined by changes in the architecture of the root system. 1 Three major processes affect the overall architecture of the root system: the rate of cell division, the rate of cell differentiation, and the extent of expansion and elongation of cells. [4][5][6] Disturbs in any of these 3 processes can affect the whole root-system architecture and the capacity of plants to survive and develop in adverse environments (Giehl et al. 7 and references therein).The root system results from the coordinated control of both genetic endogenous programs (regulating growth and organogenesis) and the action of abiotic and biotic environmental stimuli. 8,9 The dynamic control of the overall root system architecture (RSA) throughout time finally determines root plasticity and allows plants to efficiently adapt to environmental constraints. 10 The soil-environment from which plants extract nutrients and water is extremely heterogeneous, both spatially and temporally. 11 Among the nutrients present in soil, nitrate (NO 3 − ) may vary by an order of magnitude within centimeters or over the course of a day. 12 The effects of NO 3 − on the root system are complex and depend on several factors, such as the concentration available to the plant, the endogenous nitrogen status and the sensitivity of the species. 10,13,14 A considerable part of the studies aimed to unravel the mechanisms controlling RSA growth and development in response to nitrate have been focused on lateral roots (LR), 8,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20] while the nitrate-regulation of the primary root growth is still unclear. Beside NO 3 − , auxin has been demonstrated to strongly affect and control the LR development, [21][22][23][24] and an increasing number of studies suggests an overlap between auxin and NO 3 − signaling pathways in controlling LR development. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] NO 3 -has a Doubtful Role in Regulating the Growth of Primary RootsDespite the high amount of reports published on nitrate effects on root elongation, the lack of univocal results makes it difficult to clearly decipher this response ( Table 1). In Arabidopsis thaliana, inhibition of primary root growth has been observed when nitrate is applied homogeneously at high concentrations (50 mM) for 7 d, but not in a range between 0.1 and 10 mM. 35 On the contrary, in this same species Linkohr et al. 36 showed an inhibition of primary root elongation with the increase of nitrate concentration already beyond 0.01 mM, but in this case seedlings were IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; SNP, sodium n...

show abstract

Plasticity of the Arabidopsis Root System under Nutrient Deficiencies

Cited by 789 publications

References 72 publications

Integration of responses within and acrossArabidopsisnatural accessions uncovers loci controlling root systems architecture

Integration of responses within and acrossArabidopsisnatural accessions uncovers loci controlling root systems architecture

The Phosphate Fast-Responsive Genes PECP1 and PPsPase1 Affect Phosphocholine and Phosphoethanolamine Content

NO signaling is a key component of the root growth response to nitrate inZea maysL.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About