2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01595.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana: dissection of leaf development into underlying growth dynamic and cellular variables reveals invisible phenotypes

Abstract: Genetic variability in the plasticity of leaf area expansion in response to water deficit has been reported in Arabidopsis thaliana . Here, the objective was to identify the underlying dynamic and cellular processes involved in this variability. Twenty-five accessions were subjected to identical soil water deficit treatments. In all accessions, the plasticity of leaf production was low compared with that of individual leaf expansion. A subset of accessions was selected for further dissection of individual leaf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
126
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
126
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At the cellular scale, cell division and endoreduplication are reduced. Cell expansion can be maintained or decreased, depending on the maintenance of turgor and cell wall extensibility regulated by phytohormones like abscisic acid (ABA) and other local and systemic factors involved in coordination of the drought responses (Aguirrezabal et al, 2006;Cookson et al, 2006;Valliyodan and Nguyen, 2006). However, each individual response and the additive effect of several responses does not necessarily lead to drought tolerance (Tardieu, 2012).…”
Section: Plant Response To Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the cellular scale, cell division and endoreduplication are reduced. Cell expansion can be maintained or decreased, depending on the maintenance of turgor and cell wall extensibility regulated by phytohormones like abscisic acid (ABA) and other local and systemic factors involved in coordination of the drought responses (Aguirrezabal et al, 2006;Cookson et al, 2006;Valliyodan and Nguyen, 2006). However, each individual response and the additive effect of several responses does not necessarily lead to drought tolerance (Tardieu, 2012).…”
Section: Plant Response To Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) often are associated with a water conservation strategy but may cause a decrease in cumulated photosynthetic activity and therefore limit biomass production (Tardieu, 2012). In addition, reduction in cell division in leaves does not necessarily induce a reduction in leaf area, as a reduced number of cells might be compensated by an increase in cell size (Aguirrezabal et al, 2006).…”
Section: Plant Response To Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When plants are confronted with limited water availability, both cell proliferation and cell expansion are affected, leading to smaller leaves composed of fewer and smaller cells (Schuppler et al, 1998;Granier and Tardieu, 1999;Aguirrezabal et al, 2006;Skirycz et al, , 2011a. Previously, we could show that when stress hits during the proliferation phase, cell division is first reversibly arrested in a posttranscriptional manner by ethylene signaling, resulting in a reduction of CDKA activity (Skirycz et al, 2011a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought may initially inhibit leaf growth and development [Gazanchian et al 2007], and although chlorophyll content is closely associated with leaf development, response patterns of cell number and size [Lecoeur et al 1995] and chlorophyll content to water stress depend on the period of leaf development. At the cellular level, moderate water de cits (mild stress) had opposite effects on cell number and cell size, but more severe de cits reduced both variables [Aguirrezabal et al 2006]. Thus, compared with severe water de cit stress, under moderate drought the youngest leaves might increase their chlorophyll content, demonstrating adaptation to environmental stress (Table 2).…”
Section: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Qualitative and Quantitative mentioning
confidence: 99%