2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticizer Degradation by Marine Bacterial Isolates: A Proteogenomic and Metabolomic Characterization

Abstract: Many commercial plasticizers are toxic endocrine-disrupting chemicals that are added to plastics during manufacturing and may leach out once they reach the environment. Traditional phthalic acid ester plasticizers (PAEs), such as dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and bis­(2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate (DEHP), are now increasingly being replaced with more environmentally friendly alternatives, such as acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC). While the metabolic pathways for PAE degradation have been established in the terrestrial envi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many plastics, these chemicals are not only additives but are also likely intermediates of both biotic and abiotic degradation. Cyclic and noncyclic dicarboxylic acids, for example, are the most commonly identified intermediates for the abiotic degradation of PE, PP, PS, and PET [137] and are also intermediates of biotic PET [138] and polyester [48] as well as plastic additive (plasticizer) [37] degradation. It has been suggested that the microbial community that is likely able to use these more labile chemicals is only present at earlier time points [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For many plastics, these chemicals are not only additives but are also likely intermediates of both biotic and abiotic degradation. Cyclic and noncyclic dicarboxylic acids, for example, are the most commonly identified intermediates for the abiotic degradation of PE, PP, PS, and PET [137] and are also intermediates of biotic PET [138] and polyester [48] as well as plastic additive (plasticizer) [37] degradation. It has been suggested that the microbial community that is likely able to use these more labile chemicals is only present at earlier time points [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial members of the Plastisphere have been found to be: (i) different from communities that colonize other surfaces [25][26][27]; (ii) not different from communities that colonize other surfaces [28]; (iii) only different from communities colonizing other surfaces under specific environmental conditions [29,30] or at specific time points [31]; (iv) more diverse than other microbial communities [32]; (v) less diverse than other microbial communities [33,34]; (vi) potentially degrading the plastics that they colonize [35,36]; (vii) capable of degrading plastic additives [33,37,38]; and (viii) pathogenic and/or carrying antimicrobial resistance genes [39][40][41][42]. The marine Plastisphere has been heavily reviewed within the last year, e.g., [18,[43][44][45][46], and there are also several recent reviews on plastic biodegradation, e.g., [47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BHET1 exposed to PET suggests that, while it is capable of PET hydrolysis, it is not as e cient at using the BHET as the community is. No degradation intermediates were detected when each of the three bacteria were incubated with terephthalic acid suggesting: i) that the toxicity of terephthalic acid limits degradation of this compound when no other carbon source is present, as we previously found for phthalic acid [54]; or ii) the degradation pathway of terephthalic acid has no bottleneck that produces an accumulation of detectable levels of the intermediate in the culture supernatant.…”
Section: Metabolomic Assessment Of the Degradation Of Pet By Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This might be due to their ability to degrade LDPE‐related hydrocarbons as indicated by their enrichment in our laboratory incubations with LDPE as the sole carbon source after 1 year. However, whether they have the ability to degrade the LDPE hydrocarbon backbone, associated plastic additives (Wright et al ., 2020) or passively released compounds (Romera‐Castillo et al ., 2018) remains unknown. Furthermore, it is important to note that only duplicate samples were collected in the in situ incubations in the northern Adriatic, precluding rigorous statistical analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%