2017
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastics in the Marine Environment

Abstract: Plastics contamination in the marine environment was first reported nearly 50 years ago, less than two decades after the rise of commercial plastics production, when less than 50 million metric tons were produced per year. In 2014, global plastics production surpassed 300 million metric tons per year. Plastic debris has been detected worldwide in all major marine habitats, in sizes from microns to meters. In response, concerns about risks to marine wildlife upon exposure to the varied forms of plastic debris h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
390
0
14

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 799 publications
(406 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
2
390
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous surveys of Great Lakes plastic have found a 40-and 6-fold difference between the smallest and largest size classes (Eriksen et al, 2013;Mason et al, 2016). It is likely that the order of magnitude increase in the relative abundance of the smallest size class between previous Great Lakes surveys and the overall maximum abundance in our study can be attributed to our use of a 106 µm size mesh collection net, as opposed to the 333 µm mesh used previously in the Great Lakes and their tributaries (Eriksen et al, 2013;Baldwin et al, 2016;Mason et al, 2016) and in most aquatic plastic debris surveys to date (Hidalgo Ruz et al, 2012;Law, 2016). As a result, our data more comprehensively capture the "micro" plastic range in the Great Lakes, knowledge of which is critical to our assessments of environmental risk.…”
Section: Plastic Less Than 1 MM Dominated the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previous surveys of Great Lakes plastic have found a 40-and 6-fold difference between the smallest and largest size classes (Eriksen et al, 2013;Mason et al, 2016). It is likely that the order of magnitude increase in the relative abundance of the smallest size class between previous Great Lakes surveys and the overall maximum abundance in our study can be attributed to our use of a 106 µm size mesh collection net, as opposed to the 333 µm mesh used previously in the Great Lakes and their tributaries (Eriksen et al, 2013;Baldwin et al, 2016;Mason et al, 2016) and in most aquatic plastic debris surveys to date (Hidalgo Ruz et al, 2012;Law, 2016). As a result, our data more comprehensively capture the "micro" plastic range in the Great Lakes, knowledge of which is critical to our assessments of environmental risk.…”
Section: Plastic Less Than 1 MM Dominated the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…As the largest freshwater system on the planet, these critical lakes hold 20% of the world's fresh water. Plastic pollution was documented down to the smallest size class yet reported, shedding light on the magnitude of plastics in a small size class (106-333 µm) that is missing from most existing reports (Hidalgo Ruz et al, 2012;Law, 2016). This led to load estimates of nearly 2 million particles km −2 , the highest reported levels in the Great Lakes and possibly any surface water ecosystem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations