2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastid phylogenomic insights into the evolution of Caryophyllales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
147
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
16
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model to explain the major rearrangements observed in the Lamprocapnos spectabilis The Opuntia quimilo plastome reinforces some different putative structural synapomorphies that have been reported in Caryophyllales. For example, the loss of the rpl2 intron, previously suggested to be absent throughout the Centrospermae (Palmer et al 1988), is supported in our study and others newly assembled plastomes in Caryophyllales (Yao et al 2019 likely experienced independent losses of several genes of the ndh suite in their chloroplast genomes, although this was not so for tribe Opuntieae, where those genes were found to be intact ( Fig. 5, red stars).…”
Section: Insights From Chloroplast Genome Assemblies In Opuntioideae supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A model to explain the major rearrangements observed in the Lamprocapnos spectabilis The Opuntia quimilo plastome reinforces some different putative structural synapomorphies that have been reported in Caryophyllales. For example, the loss of the rpl2 intron, previously suggested to be absent throughout the Centrospermae (Palmer et al 1988), is supported in our study and others newly assembled plastomes in Caryophyllales (Yao et al 2019 likely experienced independent losses of several genes of the ndh suite in their chloroplast genomes, although this was not so for tribe Opuntieae, where those genes were found to be intact ( Fig. 5, red stars).…”
Section: Insights From Chloroplast Genome Assemblies In Opuntioideae supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this case, nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) could be a useful tool, since it has transformed the study of nonmodel plant taxa in phylogenetic inferences with high throughput data allowing deep resolutions across major plant clades (Xi et al 2012;Ma et al 2014;Gardner et al 2016;Zong et al 2019). NGS data are also showing to be extremely useful for discovering informative regions across genomes, for marker development (Wu et al 2010;Dong et al 2012;Ripma et al 2014;Reginato et al 2016), as well as to investigate chloroplast genome evolution (Dong et al 2013;Mower & Vickrey 2018;Yao et al 2019). Nevertheless, this approach is still in its infancy across Cactaceae (Majure et al 2019) and remains a path to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven species from Achatocarpaceae, Aizoaceae and Amaranthaceae s.l. were selected as outgroups, based on phylogenetic relationships constructed recently (Yao et al 2019). Phylogenetic result showed that all of the Caryophyllaceae members formed a well-supported clade and P. tunicoides clustered within the tribe Caryophylleae with 100% bootstrap support value (Figure 1), in agreement with previously published phylogenetic study (Greenberg and Donoghue 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…This technique is an optimized version of ddRADseq (double digest restriction‐site associated DNA sequencing) specifically intended for large‐scale genotyping experiments (https://www.illumina.com/science/sequencing-method-explorer/kits-and-arrays/slaf-seq.html?langsel=/us/) using deep sequencing to ensure genotyping accuracy and predesigning reduced representation library (RRL) schemes to avoid large numbers of repetitive sequences (Sun et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019). After a pilot study, two restriction enzymes ( Mse I and Hae III) were selected based on the uniqueness and uniformity of the obtained fragments, which were aligned to the reference genome of Tartary buckwheat (Zhang et al., 2017), which diverged from Rheum ~62 Ma (Yao et al., 2019). Methodological details for SLAF‐seq are described in detail in Sun et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%