2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1sm06140b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastron induced drag reduction and increased slip on a superhydrophobic sphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Figure 6 shows that the theoretical drag reduction due to the presence of the plastron around the sphere is matched well by the coupled interface simulations. Furthermore, Figure 7 shows that the velocity profiles in both the air layer and external water flow field match theoretical results deduced from the streamfunctions given in McHale et al 13 The velocity profile demonstrates the generation of slip at the air-water interface (∼0.4U ∞ ) and the discontinuous velocity gradient due to the matched shear stress but difference in dynamic viscosities of the two fluids. This suggests that the coupled interface model accurately captures the physics associated with the presence of a plastron.…”
Section: Validation and Verificationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Figure 6 shows that the theoretical drag reduction due to the presence of the plastron around the sphere is matched well by the coupled interface simulations. Furthermore, Figure 7 shows that the velocity profiles in both the air layer and external water flow field match theoretical results deduced from the streamfunctions given in McHale et al 13 The velocity profile demonstrates the generation of slip at the air-water interface (∼0.4U ∞ ) and the discontinuous velocity gradient due to the matched shear stress but difference in dynamic viscosities of the two fluids. This suggests that the coupled interface model accurately captures the physics associated with the presence of a plastron.…”
Section: Validation and Verificationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…McHale et al 13 showed analytically that the Stokes drag of a solid sphere can be reduced according to a drag modification factor (ξ ) if it is encapsulated in a sphere of a less viscous fluid as shown in Figure 1. The drag modification factor (ξ ) is calculated based on the ratio of the drag between a solid sphere (radius b) and the same solid sphere encapsulated in a plastron (thickness h, such that the composite sphere has a larger radius b + h), ξ = (Drag of sphere with plastron) Drag of sphere .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such vapor layers on free-falling spheres can efficiently reduce the drag and thus shift the drag crisis to a lower Re [22,23]. Such results with Leidenfrost vapor layers give an upper bound for the drag reduction possible by gas layers or plastrons, either sustained naturally on superhydrophobic surfaces or induced by microbubble injection [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Early experiments conducted using heated spheres in the perfluorocarbon liquid FC-72 comprising mainly perfuorohexane C 6 F 14 [22], as well as in water heated to 95°C [23], appeared to suggest that the drag reduction effect of the vapor layer follows a universal dependence on Re, with deviations from the no-vapor-layer case beginning from Re > 2 × 10 4 to a fully developed effect at Re ≃ 10 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, in the context of superhydrophobic surfaces no air is injected, and the goal is to achieve a trapped air layer covering the surface of an immersed object partially or entirely similar to a plastron encasing some aquatic insects when diving underwater (Thorpe & Crisp 1947;Shirtcliffe et al 2006;Flynn & Bush 2008;Ditsche-Kuru et al 2011). In the case of a sphere covered by a plastron an analytic solution can be found in the Stokes flow limit, and it can be shown that a flow with zero net mass flow rate develops in the gas layer encapsulating the sphere (McHale, Flynn & Newton 2011). Taking these considerations into account the alternative assumption (zero mass flow rate in the gas layer) is the applicable one in the context of typical superhydrophobic surfaces.…”
Section: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 96%