2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…RCTs in surgery may not always be ethical, feasible, or necessary to address a particular research question. If so, properly designed and conducted observational studies can be valuable alternatives for an RCT and produce credible results [7][8][9][10][11]. In this paper, we elaborate on complementary use of observational studies and RCTs and the need for both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCTs in surgery may not always be ethical, feasible, or necessary to address a particular research question. If so, properly designed and conducted observational studies can be valuable alternatives for an RCT and produce credible results [7][8][9][10][11]. In this paper, we elaborate on complementary use of observational studies and RCTs and the need for both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the primary bone healing without callus formation and due to periosteal damage by the plate, a relevant risk of refracture after plate removal is described [34]. We do not expect the same rate of refractures after nailing like shown for clavicle fractures [30,35]. Despite the mentioned improvements of the implants and good biomechanical and clinical results, locked ulna nailing is not a frequently used treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years multiple meta-analysis comparing the gold standard of plate fixation and intramedullary devices (irrespective of device or plate type) for the management of midshaft clavicle fractures have been published. [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89] These studies report similar [82][83][84][86][87][88] or superior [85,89] functional outcomes and union rates in the intramedullary fixation group. Furthermore, most report a higher rate of complications (such as infection, refracture rate) and increased surgical time when using plate fixation, making an evaluation of the devices described in the present study even more relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%