2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01302-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet distribution width is a predictive marker for development of severe retinopathy of prematurity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present review, studies that defined subjects with stage 2 ROP or less as cases were explicitly excluded, to avoid confusion when interpreting the results (Figure 1). However, the definition of cases still differed significantly among studies, including type I ROP, 15,18,20,22,24,27,28,33 AP-ROP, 19 or ROP requiring treatment, encompassing both type I and AP-ROP, 16,21,23,26,[29][30][31] or at least stage 3 ROP. 25,31,32 Likewise, the definition of controls differed largely, including infants without ROP, 24,25,[27][28][29][30]32,33 ROP up to stage 1, 15,18,20,22,23 ROP up to stage 2, 19,31 or infants with less severe ROP, presumably including up to stage 3 without plus disease, namely type II ROP, 16,26 or even infants with unspecified ROP stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present review, studies that defined subjects with stage 2 ROP or less as cases were explicitly excluded, to avoid confusion when interpreting the results (Figure 1). However, the definition of cases still differed significantly among studies, including type I ROP, 15,18,20,22,24,27,28,33 AP-ROP, 19 or ROP requiring treatment, encompassing both type I and AP-ROP, 16,21,23,26,[29][30][31] or at least stage 3 ROP. 25,31,32 Likewise, the definition of controls differed largely, including infants without ROP, 24,25,[27][28][29][30]32,33 ROP up to stage 1, 15,18,20,22,23 ROP up to stage 2, 19,31 or infants with less severe ROP, presumably including up to stage 3 without plus disease, namely type II ROP, 16,26 or even infants with unspecified ROP stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the definition of cases still differed significantly among studies, including type I ROP, 15,18,20,22,24,27,28,33 AP-ROP, 19 or ROP requiring treatment, encompassing both type I and AP-ROP, 16,21,23,26,[29][30][31] or at least stage 3 ROP. 25,31,32 Likewise, the definition of controls differed largely, including infants without ROP, 24,25,[27][28][29][30]32,33 ROP up to stage 1, 15,18,20,22,23 ROP up to stage 2, 19,31 or infants with less severe ROP, presumably including up to stage 3 without plus disease, namely type II ROP, 16,26 or even infants with unspecified ROP stage. 21 All these variations may affect the difference in the severity of ROP between the studied groups and therefore may have an impact on the outcome of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Identifying risk factors for ROP may enhance the efficacy of screening programs. Various studies have attempted to clarify the relationship between platelet counts and ROP [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] ( Table 5 ). To our best knowledge, this is the first study to document that adjusted weekly mean platelet counts over the first 6 weeks of life have no direct relationship with ROP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%