2017
DOI: 10.5603/mrj.2016.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet reactivity during mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with ticagrelor: study protocol of a single-centre study

Abstract: In summary, the available data on the antiplatelet efficacy of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors suggest their less potent and/or delayed effect in patients undergoing mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH). However, previous studies do not explain the mechanisms of the impact of MTH on platelet function. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence of any relationship between the increased prevalence of thrombotic complications in MTH patients and the anti-platelet effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors.We hypothesise that MTH may… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximal plasma concentration of ticagrelor was lower in MTH group vs. no-MTH group (C max for ticagrelor: 475 ± 353 vs. 1568 ± 784 ng/mL, p = 0.0002), whereas there were no differences in maximal concentration of the metabolite between the groups (C max for AR-C124910XX: 203 ± 121 vs. 337 ± 186 ng/mL; p = 0.1). Time to achieve maximal plasma concentrations was delayed for both ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX in MTH group vs. no-MTH group (t max for ticagrelor: 12 [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] vs. 4 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] h, p = 0.01; t max for AR-C124910XX: 18 [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] vs. 4 [4][5][6]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The maximal plasma concentration of ticagrelor was lower in MTH group vs. no-MTH group (C max for ticagrelor: 475 ± 353 vs. 1568 ± 784 ng/mL, p = 0.0002), whereas there were no differences in maximal concentration of the metabolite between the groups (C max for AR-C124910XX: 203 ± 121 vs. 337 ± 186 ng/mL; p = 0.1). Time to achieve maximal plasma concentrations was delayed for both ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX in MTH group vs. no-MTH group (t max for ticagrelor: 12 [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] vs. 4 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] h, p = 0.01; t max for AR-C124910XX: 18 [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] vs. 4 [4][5][6]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was designed and performed as a phase IV, single-center, investigator-initiated, prospective, observational trial aimed to compare pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor between MI patients after OHCA treated with primary PCI and MTH (MTH group) and MI patients without OHCA treated with primary PCI (no-MTH group). The inclusion as well as exclusion criteria for both groups have been previously published [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations