1989
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198904000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plates Versus External Fixation in Severe Open Tibial Shaft Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
115
0
6

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
115
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies were excluded if, for any enrolled patient: (1) stabilization had been delayed more than 48 hours, or (2) irrigation and débridement of the open wound was delayed more than 12 hours, (3) the stabilization technique was preceded by another form of operative stabilization (eg, external fixation before intramedullary nailing), or (4) fractures extended into the knee or ankle.…”
Section: Search Strategy and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Studies were excluded if, for any enrolled patient: (1) stabilization had been delayed more than 48 hours, or (2) irrigation and débridement of the open wound was delayed more than 12 hours, (3) the stabilization technique was preceded by another form of operative stabilization (eg, external fixation before intramedullary nailing), or (4) fractures extended into the knee or ankle.…”
Section: Search Strategy and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another six articles were excluded (Appendix 1. Supplemental materials are available with the online version of CORR 1 ), leaving 14 eligible studies [2,12,13,19,22,25,27,30,39,[41][42][43][44][45] for our survey. The weighted kappa for full-text article eligibility was good (j = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98).…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations