2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3102184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platforms and the Sharing Economy: An Analysis EU H2020 Research Project Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy, 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Botsman and Rogers [6] describe this as "collaborative consumption"; Lamberton and Rose [7] as "commercial sharing systems"; Humphreys and Grayson [8] as "co-production"; Lanier and Schau [9] and Prahalad and Ramaswamy [10] as "co-creation"; Katz [11] and Lobel [12] as "platform economy"; Mont [13] as "product-service systems"; Bardhi and Eckhardt [14] as "access-based consumption,"; Fitzsimmons [15] as "consumer participation"; Schor [16] and Frenken and Schor [17] as "stranger sharing"; and Postigo [18] as "online volunteering". In order to extract specific knowledge from the existing literature, the term sharing economy will be further divided into two main sub-categories: traditional sharing practice (TSP) and SE [19]. While in traditional approach, products and services are shared based on mutual deals or agreements between both sides of consumers, SE uses payments and feedback or complaints through the platforms based on Web 2.0 technologies [20].…”
Section: A Qualitative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Botsman and Rogers [6] describe this as "collaborative consumption"; Lamberton and Rose [7] as "commercial sharing systems"; Humphreys and Grayson [8] as "co-production"; Lanier and Schau [9] and Prahalad and Ramaswamy [10] as "co-creation"; Katz [11] and Lobel [12] as "platform economy"; Mont [13] as "product-service systems"; Bardhi and Eckhardt [14] as "access-based consumption,"; Fitzsimmons [15] as "consumer participation"; Schor [16] and Frenken and Schor [17] as "stranger sharing"; and Postigo [18] as "online volunteering". In order to extract specific knowledge from the existing literature, the term sharing economy will be further divided into two main sub-categories: traditional sharing practice (TSP) and SE [19]. While in traditional approach, products and services are shared based on mutual deals or agreements between both sides of consumers, SE uses payments and feedback or complaints through the platforms based on Web 2.0 technologies [20].…”
Section: A Qualitative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…732117, funded by the EU (Horizon 2020) -"Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy". It analyzes the expectations of Internet platform users in order to identify the principles of the sharing economy, also for further development of new Internet platforms (Stanoevska-Slabeva K., Lenz-Kesekamp V., Suter V. (2017) [11]). Despite the closeness of the research area, this project, unfortunately, does not consider entrepreneurs as a special group of platform participants, does not analyze their behavior in terms of cognitive distortions.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Studies On Micro-entrepreneurs On Internet Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of economy, various terms of the same concept are found. Bretta (2018) Stanoevska-Slabeva et al (2017 and many others used the term "sharing economy" to refer to the emerging taxation framework. Maselli et al (2016) argued that "the definition of the sharing economy is precise, but somewhat restrictive" and used in their essay the term "on-demand economy".…”
Section: The Concept and Trends Of Collaborative Economymentioning
confidence: 99%