1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1716.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platinum Agents and Secondary Myeloid Leukaemia: Two Cases Treated Only With Platinum‐based Drugs

Abstract: With the increasing use of chemotherapy for many different primary malignancies, secondary or therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemias (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are becoming more common. The risk of developing sAML has been estimated to be between 2% and 10%, depending upon the type, duration and dosage of previous therapy (Michels et al, 1985; Shulman, 1993; Robinson & Mertens, 1993; Ballen & Antin, 1993). It is therefore one of the most serious long-term complications of current cancer treatm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The telomeric portion of the MLL bcr is a preferred target for specific cleavage resulting from higher-order chromatin fragmentation during apoptosis and therefore would be a preferred target region for chromosomal translocations caused by this mechanism. Of note, there are several reports of patients with t-AML characteristic of t-AML associated with topo II inhibitor therapy (a short latency period, monocytic phenotype, and MLL translocations) whose chemotherapeutic regimens did not incorporate topo II inhibitors but who were instead treated with chemotherapeutic drugs such as alkylating agents or antimetabolites (20,32,46), which can induce apoptosis. While these t-AML cases may in fact be de novo leukemias, an alternate explanation would be that a chemotherapeutic agent which does not target topo II, but which can induce apoptosis, had caused the translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The telomeric portion of the MLL bcr is a preferred target for specific cleavage resulting from higher-order chromatin fragmentation during apoptosis and therefore would be a preferred target region for chromosomal translocations caused by this mechanism. Of note, there are several reports of patients with t-AML characteristic of t-AML associated with topo II inhibitor therapy (a short latency period, monocytic phenotype, and MLL translocations) whose chemotherapeutic regimens did not incorporate topo II inhibitors but who were instead treated with chemotherapeutic drugs such as alkylating agents or antimetabolites (20,32,46), which can induce apoptosis. While these t-AML cases may in fact be de novo leukemias, an alternate explanation would be that a chemotherapeutic agent which does not target topo II, but which can induce apoptosis, had caused the translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of MDS in one patient eleven months after the therapy, the first noted case of possible treatment related leukemia following JM-216 therapy, supports the hypothesis of stem cell damage. Presence of complex karyotype (including 7q-, an abnormality typically associated with prior chemotherapy related leukemia/MDS) in our patient and existence of reports describing higher incidence of secondary leukemia following cisplatin and carboplatin therapy in ovarian cancer favors this conclusion [25,26]. The cause and significance of lymphopenia in majority of patients during the treatment phase is also not clear even though it has been reported in other studies evaluating estrogen, corticosteroids, suramin and mitoxantrone in HRPC [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…None of the five cases of t-AML published aftercisplatin or carboplatin-monotherapy have shown a typical alkylator type cytogenetic alteration, [2,4,14] indicating that platin-derivatives alone may induce topoisomerase II inhibitor type t-AML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%