2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in pre-treated malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients: A mono-institutional experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again an interesting response was obtained, with a clinical benefit observed in 20 out of 30 patients (disease control rate, DCR, 66%, PR and SD), both by radiological assessment and reduction of pain. Overall TTP and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively, considering other similar reports from the literature: a French cohort, where several different drugs were used in second-line for patients affected by mesothelioma, showed 3.8 and 12.2 months, respectively for TTP and OS [21], while in a mono-institutional Italian cohort salvage therapy with gemcitabine-platin combination in second or further line demonstrated 3 and 5.5 months, respectively as TTP and OS [22]. We are aware that our group of patients was selected for good prognostic factors, such as PS, benefit after first-line treatment (SD or RP) and a quite long TTP after the end of first-line treatment; moreover no patient was affected by pure sarcomatoid histotype, considered one of the worst prognostic factors [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Once again an interesting response was obtained, with a clinical benefit observed in 20 out of 30 patients (disease control rate, DCR, 66%, PR and SD), both by radiological assessment and reduction of pain. Overall TTP and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively, considering other similar reports from the literature: a French cohort, where several different drugs were used in second-line for patients affected by mesothelioma, showed 3.8 and 12.2 months, respectively for TTP and OS [21], while in a mono-institutional Italian cohort salvage therapy with gemcitabine-platin combination in second or further line demonstrated 3 and 5.5 months, respectively as TTP and OS [22]. We are aware that our group of patients was selected for good prognostic factors, such as PS, benefit after first-line treatment (SD or RP) and a quite long TTP after the end of first-line treatment; moreover no patient was affected by pure sarcomatoid histotype, considered one of the worst prognostic factors [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Since 2003, when antifolate agents were introduced in the clinical management of this disease, the standard procedure chemotherapy is a platinum-based doublet plus pemetrexed or raltitrexed. [30][31][32][33] Recent studies tested biologic agents that target key oncogenic pathways, including phosphatidylinositol3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways, histone deacetylases, nuclear factor kB, and neoangiogenesis. 29 After the standard first-line pemetrexed/platinum combination, there is not a defined regimen for the secondline treatment of MPM, and the clinical benefits are uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study evaluated pemetrexed naïve patients with MPM, the median OS were 9.8 months and 8.6 months for pemetrexed and carboplatin (Sorensen et al, 2007). Generally, in most of studies, chemotherapy was able to control symptoms and prolong the time to progression (Agatsuma et al, 2010;Margery et al, 2010;Pasello et al, 2011;Tourkantonis et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%