2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-32180-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PLAUs: Posit Logarithmic Approximate Units to Implement Low-Cost Operations with Real Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are set with parameters in the Register-Transfer Level (RTL) description of the core, so they take effect at synthesis time. Furthermore, as typically the multiplicative arithmetic units are among the most power-hungry modules [34], [35], [36], we permit either the use of the logarithm-approximate units presented in [37] or exact units for the multiplication, division and square root operations [38]. The exact units for these last two operations use a non-restoring division algorithm [39].…”
Section: Big-percival Corementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are set with parameters in the Register-Transfer Level (RTL) description of the core, so they take effect at synthesis time. Furthermore, as typically the multiplicative arithmetic units are among the most power-hungry modules [34], [35], [36], we permit either the use of the logarithm-approximate units presented in [37] or exact units for the multiplication, division and square root operations [38]. The exact units for these last two operations use a non-restoring division algorithm [39].…”
Section: Big-percival Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the target application can tolerate some errors in the division and square root outputs, using the logarithmapproximate units [37] allows for a significant reduction in LUT and FF usage. This is especially true in the 64-bit case, where the total PAU LUTs can be cut in half and the FFs reduced to only 25%.…”
Section: Fpgamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation