1999
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed1004_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Play and Divergent Problem Solving: Evidence Supporting a Reciprocal Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this body of scholarship, play has been shown to have a positive influence on two primary means of creative expression: problem solving and ideational fluency. With respect to problem solving, play experiences can help children learn to generate a broader range of solutions to challenging problems (Curran, 1999;Wyver & Spence, 1999). In terms of ideational fluency, a meta-analysis of the literature on play and development conducted by Fisher (1992) determined that children who spend more time in openended play tend to display an increased ability to generate a myriad of divergent ideas in their writing, language, and artistic endeavors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this body of scholarship, play has been shown to have a positive influence on two primary means of creative expression: problem solving and ideational fluency. With respect to problem solving, play experiences can help children learn to generate a broader range of solutions to challenging problems (Curran, 1999;Wyver & Spence, 1999). In terms of ideational fluency, a meta-analysis of the literature on play and development conducted by Fisher (1992) determined that children who spend more time in openended play tend to display an increased ability to generate a myriad of divergent ideas in their writing, language, and artistic endeavors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New-use ideation tasks form the basis for the widely used Alternate Uses Task (AUT), a divergent thinking assessment technique (Christensen, Guilford, Merrifield, & Wilson, 1960;Guilford, 1967) involving the generation of new uses for everyday objects. Throughout extensive and varied use in creativity research the AUT has been shown to reliably measure various aspects of divergent thinking such as ideational fluency, flexibility, and originality (Dyne & Saavedra, 1996;Wyver & Spence, 1999;Ames & Runco, 2005;Fink, Benedek, Grabner, Staudt, & Neubauer, 2007), although there is some debate about how best to evaluate AUT performance (Mouchiroud & Lubart, 2001;Plucker & Runco, 1998b;Silvia, Martin, & Nusbaum, 2009;Silvia et al, 2008). Creativity researchers have also acknowledged that although there is an extensive body of research examining divergent thinking via content-general tasks such as the AUT, a more complete evaluation of creativity must include domain-specific evaluations (T. Amabile, 1996;Pretz & Link, 2008) and research into other components of creative behaviour such as convergent thinking (Runco, 1991;Mouchiroud & Lubart, 2001;Dietrich & Kanso, 2010).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Alternate Uses Task has also been used to explore the underlying mental and neurological processes that influence divergent thinking (Gilhooly, Fioratou, Anthony, & Wynn, 2007). Understanding and supporting divergent thinking has important implications in a wide range of areas, including childhood social development (Wyver & Spence, 1999), workplace group dynamics (Dyne & Saavedra, 1996), product design (Dahl & Moreau, 2002), engineering (Dym, Agogino, Eris, Frey, & Leifer, 2005) and entrepreneurship (Ames & Runco, 2005).…”
Section: Human Creativity and Divergent Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers found that children with a longer history of shared collaboration play were more successful of pretend play (Doyle, Connolly, & Rivest, 1980;Green, Cillessen, Berthelsen, Irving, & Catherwood, 2003;Howes & Norris, 1993), and free play in groups without external interventions leads to significant longer cooperative play (Gmitrová & Gmitrov, 2003). Quality of cooperative play is related to cognitive and social competence in school (Blair, Denham, Kochanoff, & Whipple, 2004;Gruss, Jackson, Grimson, & Hedgcock, 1998;Hogan & Tudge, 1999;Kontos & Keyes, 1999;Lloyd & Howe, 2003;McClelland & Morrison, 2003;NICHD, 2004;Pianta & Stuhlman, 2004;Spinrad et al, 2004;Wyver & Spence, 1999). Cooperative play therefore, is a major developmental task, as children become part of a classroom and a school community (Fantuzzo et al, 1995;Wentzel & Looney, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%