2009
DOI: 10.1080/14660970903239941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Playing games with ‘race’: understanding resistance to ‘race’ equality initiatives in English local football governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, on one hand, football managers try to maximize sports performance due to personal interests (they can have greater contractual power, maximize their salaries, etc. ); on the other hand, shareholders want to maximize financial performance (Dietl & Franck, 2007;El Hodiri & Quirk, 1974;Hassan & Hamil, 2010;Hope, 2003;Lusted, 2009). Thus, according to these authors, if a club has fewer shareholders (or the owners are from the same family), the goal will not be to maximize profits in the short term but to obtain more benefits in the middle-long term.…”
Section: Governance Factors and Sports Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, on one hand, football managers try to maximize sports performance due to personal interests (they can have greater contractual power, maximize their salaries, etc. ); on the other hand, shareholders want to maximize financial performance (Dietl & Franck, 2007;El Hodiri & Quirk, 1974;Hassan & Hamil, 2010;Hope, 2003;Lusted, 2009). Thus, according to these authors, if a club has fewer shareholders (or the owners are from the same family), the goal will not be to maximize profits in the short term but to obtain more benefits in the middle-long term.…”
Section: Governance Factors and Sports Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors argued that football clubs should try to pursue profit maximization, highlighting a classic agency problem due to the interests of two kinds of figures-the football managers and the proprietors (Dietl & Franck, 2007;El Hodiri & Quirk, 1974;Hassan & Hamil, 2010;Lusted 2009;Scully, 1994). Indeed, on one hand, football managers try to maximize sports performance due to personal interests (they can have greater contractual power, maximize their salaries, etc.…”
Section: Governance Factors and Sports Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Lusted (2009) explains, CFAs are semi-autonomous in that they enjoy relative financial independence in their governance and are not subject to the very visible accountability that the FA has been subjected to in recent years in responding to external pressure to reform its structure and policies. Indeed, Lusted has shown that County FAs routinely reproduce hegemonic ideologies of meritocracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But a lack of progress in addressing gender has been particularly notable in English football (e.g. Williams, 2014) and the English Football Association has come under persistent pressure from both UEFA and FIFA as well as domestic organizations (see Lusted, 2009) to address the continued concerns about poor gender inclusion and provision since they were pushed by FIFA to oversee English women's football in 1993.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the historically inscribed power relations and limited existing demographic of older, white, males, within football governance infrastructures, it is hardly unsurprising that minority populations continue to be marginalised from the benefits and profits of these hegemonic white networks of mutual acquaintance. Whilst the relative absence of minorities from these governance infrastructures is underpinned by processes of unconscious and indirect forms of institutional discrimination, a number of authors have suggested some deeply embedded 'cultures of resistance' to more equitable change amongst key stakeholders within the governance of the game , Hylton 2009, Long 2000, Long et al 2002, 2005, Lusted 2009. This resistance to change is to some extent reflective of the dominant political paradigms in certain nation states, in which relatively closed models of national identity and citizenship underpin limited policy approaches to dealing with minorities premised on assimilation or non intervention.…”
Section: Concluding Comments: the Limits Of Resistance And The Centramentioning
confidence: 99%