1994
DOI: 10.1080/03468759408579274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Playing Second Fiddle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 However, the argument is that Norway, as well as Hungary in the Habsburg Empire after 1867, did not play more than 'second fiddle' in their respective dual states' foreign politics. 15 They found themselves subordinated to their dominant union partners, respectively Sweden and Austria, in the forging of their foreign relations. In one view, the foreign political decision-making apparatus for the Nordic Union was 'almost sheer Swedish'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 However, the argument is that Norway, as well as Hungary in the Habsburg Empire after 1867, did not play more than 'second fiddle' in their respective dual states' foreign politics. 15 They found themselves subordinated to their dominant union partners, respectively Sweden and Austria, in the forging of their foreign relations. In one view, the foreign political decision-making apparatus for the Nordic Union was 'almost sheer Swedish'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also a correct observation that Norwegian interests did not have a solid legally secured influence. 25 However, at a political level, Norwegian influence on the foreign policies of the Union seems to have existed without formal guarantees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%