2006
DOI: 10.3200/joeb.82.1.27-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Playing the Ponies: A $5 Million Embezzlement Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fraud triangle theory consists of three elements: (a) perceived pressure, (b) opportunity, and (c) rationalization. Based on this theory, fraud is impossible without these three elements, and the severity of fraud depends on the strength of each element (Howe and Malgwi, 2006). Wolfe and Hermanson (2004) introduced an extension of fraud triangle theory by adding an additional element, namely capacity, so this theory was later called fraud diamond theory.…”
Section: B Fraud Diamond Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fraud triangle theory consists of three elements: (a) perceived pressure, (b) opportunity, and (c) rationalization. Based on this theory, fraud is impossible without these three elements, and the severity of fraud depends on the strength of each element (Howe and Malgwi, 2006). Wolfe and Hermanson (2004) introduced an extension of fraud triangle theory by adding an additional element, namely capacity, so this theory was later called fraud diamond theory.…”
Section: B Fraud Diamond Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraud behavior usually arises from the pressure obtained by employees in an organization. Albrecht, Hill, et al (2006), Albrecht, Turnbull, Zhang, and Skousen (2010), and Howe and Malgwi (2006) argue that fraud behavior is caused by economic pressures such as greed, lifestyle, large expenses or personal debt, loan problems, financial losses and inability to meet financial plans;…”
Section: B Fraud Diamond Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the pressure to commit occupational fraud can be broadly classified into financial pressures and non-financial pressures (AIC & PwC, 2003;Fitzsimons, 2009;Albrecht et al, 2012). Non-financial pressures can be further categorized as (1) work-related pressure (Hollinger & Clark, 1983;Baucus, 1994;Holton, 2009;Peterson & Gibson, 2003;Bartlett et al, 2004); (2) pressure associated with gambling and drug addiction (Sakurai & Smith, 2003;Howe & Malgwi, 2006;Kelly & Hartley, 2010);and (3) pressure associated with individuals who want to make a statement by living luxurious lifestyles (Rezaee, 2005;Dellaportas, 2013;.…”
Section: Pressure To Commit Occupational Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Easy access to online gambling including poker and gaming machines, casinos and lotto-style games has contributed to a substantial growth in the gambling industry (Sakurai & Smith, 2003;Howe & Malgwi, 2006;Kelly & Hartley, 2010).…”
Section: Pressure To Commit Occupational Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-financial pressure can be further classified into (a) work-related pressure (Peterson and Gibson, 2003;Holton, 2009;and Bartlett et al, 2004); (b) pressure related to people who want to live on extravagant lifestyles/ living beyond one's means (Rezaee, 2005;Neu et al, 2013;Dellaportas, 2014); and (c) pressure related to drug addiction and gambling (Kelly and Hartley, 2010;Howe and Malgwi, 2006). In organization context, financial strain, namely a failed market investments or distress business, whether it ascends from misfortune or recklessness, is the catalyst which mobilizes numerous individual to perpetrate fraud (Cressey, 1950).…”
Section: Figure 1:-fraud Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%